Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The importance of the study of organizational buyer behavior to the personal selling function is that the personal seller can easily realize the expectation of the organizations.
It also assists in determining what makes organizations buy a certain product.
It gives the seller the proper ideas on the type of products preferred by organization buyers such that they can quickly make them available.
It also ensures the seller understands how the organization buyer operates in terms of payments, quality, quantity, and the purpose in which they are buying.
Answer: Option (b) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Revenues = $300,000
Merchandise it purchased = $75,000
Salaries paid = $14,000
Owners invested = $23,000
Borrowed on a five-year note = $23,000
Interest paid = $3,000
Paid for a two-year insurance policy = $6,800
Income tax rate = 9%
Gross Margin = Revenues - Cost of Goods Sold
= $300,000 - $75,000
= $225,000
Profit before tax = Gross Margin - Salaries - Insurance payment - Interest
= $225,000 - 14,000 - 3,400 - 3,000
= $204,600
Net Income = Profit before tax - Tax at 9%
= $204,600 - 18,414
= $186,186
Answer:
8
Explanation:
Every year, the National Association of Business Professionals of America (BPA) elects up to 10 student representatives. The National Officers are elected from the Secondary and Post-secondary Divisions.
For the year 2019-2020, there are eight national officers; six from the secondary divide and two from the post-secondary division
<span>What is productive efficiency? A situation in which resources are allocated such that goods can be produced at their lowest possible average cost.
The resources are wanting to be used at the lowest possible average cost so that companies aren't having to give up the production of another item to produce that one. Being efficient while still maintaining good quality is the overall goal of productive efficiency.
</span>
Explanation:
Looking from a fair point of view, the White owners of businesses have legitimate reasons to feel that the Act constitutes illegal reverse discrimination.
Remember, reverse discrimination implies an unfair treatment of the majority group (White owners) in an effort to please the minority group. This is evident from the fact that the 10 percent of all federal grants to be released by the Economic Development Administration was only to be used to purchase services or supplies from businesses owned and controlled by U.S. citizens belonging to one of six minority groups excluding the White business owners; making the White owners feel discriminated against.
Thus, unintentionally the Act became a reverse discrimination on White business owners.
