Explanation:
<h3>The boys returned the horse to Byro not because they were afraid but because their conscience pric.ked them. </h3>
An explanation of how a value judgment would have no objective truth because there is a difference in opinion/perspective.
<h3>What is an Objective Truth?</h3>
This refers to the truth that is spoken without the use of bias that is accurate.
Hence, we can see that a value judgment is the assessment of a thing as being good or bad based on the standards and priority of a person.
A factual statement on the other hand is either true or false and would remain the same, irrespective of perspectives or opinions.
Read more about objective truths here:
brainly.com/question/17133736
#SPJ1
Answer:
I have a few ideas:
<u>If</u><u> </u><u>you</u><u> </u><u>do</u><u> </u><u>kill</u><u> </u><u>him</u><u> </u><u>off</u><u>:</u>
- You can kill him off, but the guy who made him immortal can change his mind and revive him.
- He could just die, and that could be the end of it.
- Alternatively, the guy who made him immortal can remove the ability without killing him.
<u>If you don't kill him off:</u>
- He could be shown a new purpose in life, where he can use his powers of immortality for the good of humanity.
- The immortality can be removed, but there will be a major cost, and the guy might soon regret giving up his abilities.
- You can have the guy who made him immortal, refuse to do anything about the situation.
- Or you can also make him "agree to do it" but never ends up doing it. (This can cause more interesting things to occur between, both the immortal guy and the guy who made him immortal. Such as the guy finding ways to cope with his immortality, the immortal guy loathing the guy who turned him immortal, and even the guy who made the other one immortal, promising "to make things right" even though he's not planning to keep his word.)
Hope this helps you friend :)
And if you want more ideas, hmu in comments or something.
Answer:
Napoleon gains power over the animals by two means. First, he twists the ideas of the animals' revolution to suggest that questioning his authority is tantamount to treason to Animal Farm, and the good of the whole. This is part of his larger strategy of manipulation of the truth. Squealer, his "propaganda minister," is especially adept at getting the animals to believe whatever is necessary to promote Napoleon's power. After Napoleon drives Snowball from the farm, for example, it is Squealer who convinces the animals that constructing the windmill was actually Napoleon's idea (even though Snowball had publicly endorsed it against Napoleon's wishes). He further suggests that Snowball, who had in fact fought bravely in the battles to establish Animal Farm, had in fact been in league with Jones, the farmer, the whole time. Snowball's ability to twist information is best exemplified by the winnowing down of the original Seven Commandments to one, which claims that while all animals are equal, some animals "are more equal than others."
