There are multiple ways of comparing and contrasting structures that each have different implications and dangers.
1. The back-and-forth method, in which every other sentence compares and contrasts. ie:
P1- theme
-p1 Book A is blah, whereas Book B is blah.
P2- theme
-p2 Book A is blah.... you get the point,
The danger of this method is sounding too redundant, although it does a good job of focusing on the themes.
2. The separate, mixed theme method, in which an entire paragraph is dedicated to each subject, but the themes are thus mixed up within those paragraphs. This method is less redundant but runs the risk of losing clarity of theme.
3. The compare vs. contrast method. This one is fairly straightforward: A paragraph comparing, a paragraph contrasting, and one of synthesis at the end. The pros: It's playing it safe, and it'll work. The cons: It's boring.
Combinations of these 3 methods work as well, it all depends on your personal writing style and the subjects you're comparing.
Good luck
The answer is b because that wouldn’t motivate them
Answer: Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King Jr, and Harriet Tubman.
Explanation:
I would love if Rosa Parks, and Martin Luther King Jr were there. So, I could thank them for all they have done, for the people of colors, freedom today. I would love if Harriet Tubman was there, and I'd thank her for helping many slaves be set free, and for all she has done.
I would ask Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr, how did they manage civil rights movement so well, and so fearlessly? I would ask Harriet Tubman was the Underground Railroad a true place?
(Since it's Black History month, that is why I decided these people.)
