Answer:
The correct answer is D) Indian princes' inability to decide on a format of government
Explanation:
When the British gave Independence to India in 1947 it was an extremely fractures land and not an autonomous state. This is because 'British India' consisted of nearly 400 so-called princely-States that were not part of the British crown directly, but were allies who controlled their own State, including many which even had their own currency.
When the British left, New Delhi politicians wanted to create an autonomous State. While there were vast differences in races, creed and religion, the biggest hurdle came when many princes refused to join the Indian Union.
Some were skeptical of Congress party and could not agree to a formal agreement. Eventually Vallabhbhai Patel, an influential politician was able to bring together difference princes and convinced them to join India.
A) Establish their own nation
Answer:
When they gained democracy, they treated their economic issues more than discussions of how to strengthen and consolidate democracy and human development.
The weapons from those wars have remained in the hands of soldiers and rebels or have been sold on the street which has contributed to atrocious levels of violent crime.
The recognition of human rights is gradually becoming more practicable and some of the more heinous crimes of our the past are being brought to justice
Early settlements in America would have needed to be along waterways because of their ships. The supplies they brought with them were on the ship, plus if the motherland had sent an annual resupply then it would’ve been easier to access the colonists if they were near the shore.
Also France was interested in economic growth so when they didn’t find gold and silver in Canada (or New France) like the Spanish did in the Mexico area, they found profit in the trading for beaver pelts. So they also needed to be near waterways for a quicker return to France to sell the goods they collected in the America’s.
