Answer:
It changes the mood from somebody who is curious about what's written in the diary<em> </em><em>(Mr. Frank)</em> to somebody who is eager to tell a story<em> (Anne Frank). </em>
The author chose to do that <u>in order to let the audience know what it's like to be reading another person's diary from what it's like to write a diary, as in Anne's case.</u> It also allows the audience to know the<em> actual date and setting </em>when Anne started writing the diary.
Explanation:
The question above is related to the drama entitled, "The Diary of Anne Frank."
It can be seen in Line 59 that <em>Mr. Frank </em>started reading Anne's Diary. This was after Miep told him that there were letters and notes in the bundles of paper that she gave him.
As Mr Frank was reading, <u>his voice shifted to Anne's voice</u>. This was the time she talked about his father's business and how her family went into hiding.
The answer is B because the priest was pressured by people around him as well as Ophelia coming from a wealthy family.
I'll answer this question based on the definition of an objective summary (a summary having no signs of bias or opinion).
So the sentence that best describes the example of an objective summary is:
"<span>Using Colorado Springs as his focal point, Mr Schlosser takes the reader on a behind-the-scenes tour of the fast-food industry that includes slaughterhouses, poultry processors, artificial flavors."
Hope my answer has helped you.</span>
It entirely based on his own opinion
