1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alexus [3.1K]
2 years ago
12

How did the vietnam war affect american ideas about freedom?

History
1 answer:
Alisiya [41]2 years ago
5 0

The Vietnam War is known to have a huge influence on America. The uncommonness of the war brought about the end of the military draft in 1973. Because of this, U.S. has not conscript troops from the general population again.

The war is also known to have in a lot of ways lowered drastically Americans' trust in their political leaders. This was because the president lied about what was going on in the war.

The Vietnam War was known to have damaged the U.S. economy. The war also reduced U.S. military morale.

A lot of U.S. soldiers about 58,000 were killed during the Vietnam War.

Learn more about Vietman war from

brainly.com/question/1332887

You might be interested in
List the reforms that napoleon made as leader of france
lutik1710 [3]
A. controlled prices (mostly on food) 
b. it encouraged a new industry
c. he set up public school under strict goverment. (military school)
d. he encouraged the emigres to comes home ( they took an oath of loyalty to France)
e. recognized peasants to land the peasants bought from the Catholic Church.
<span>f.opened jobs based for all talents</span>
5 0
3 years ago
The alphabet used for Russian and some other Slavic languages_____.
Elenna [48]
The answer should is C. St. Cyril and his brother Methodius created the first slavic alphabet in order to translate the Greek's religious text. 
4 0
3 years ago
What was the purpose of herodotus'history?
Debora [2.8K]
Herodotus is famously known by the dual moniker, “Father of History, Father of Lies”. Whether or not he deserves the latter epithet is perhaps up for debate. He is sometimes criticized as unserious for his many cultural digressions and travelog sidebars. It would, however, take a truly obtuse and narrow-minded critic to deny him the former title. History as a thing separate from record-keeping and chronicling begins with Herodotus. In and among his entertaining and diverting rabbit trails is some of the best and most important history ever written. He shows those who would do history after him what they were to strive for. It is in the opening lines of the Histories where Herodotus establishes the scope and purpose of history, and in doing so establishes its role in man’s attempt to understand his world.

The lines which begin the Histories are a model of clarity and simplicity. There is no excess rhetoric, no flowery overstatement. Herodotus states succinctly in the above passage the purpose for his account. His “enquiries” (ἱστορία) were made to serve memory and understanding—memory in preserving the deeds of men, understanding in examining how the circumstances of those actions came about.

Herodotus’ treatment of memory in this passage is more than just a simple remembrance. He is doing more than just recording a how, where, and when. The preservation of memory here is active, even aggressive, as if time were attempting to destroy the things of man, and history is a brandished weapon holding it at bay.

Almost as an afterthought, Herodotus appends onto his paean to memory a secondary goal. Among the matters covered will be “…the cause of the conflict between the Greeks and non-Greeks.” This is just casually thrown in as if to remind you to look for it along the way. Here Herodotus is understating his purpose, and by playing down this item, he shows its importance. The discovery of the causes of action, and why men have acted as they have, is the heart of the study of history.

So what is the cause of the conflict between the Greeks and the non-Greeks? What was the spark that began the fire that led the largest army in antiquity to cross from Asia to Europe in order to subdue the cities of Attica and the Peloponnese? Herodotus’ examination of this is more subtle than some will give him credit for, and is composed of one part scholarly guile, and one part showmanship. He will look at the opinions of the Asians and the Greeks, and then settle on the pattern that will lead him through his entire enquiry.

“According to learned Persians, it was the Phoenicians who caused the conflict....”1 So begins Herodotus’ examination of the causes of the great conflict. Right away, he is already showing historians their business - he is sourcing his work. He is telling you whose opinion he is working with. As he proceeds, he relates the Persians’ story of Phoenicians going to Argos and abducting Io. In a turnabout, some Greeks go to Tyre and abduct Europa, while some others go to Colchis and abduct Princess Medea (there is some confusion amongst the Persians as to whether the former group were properly Greek, or Cretan). All of the second round of abductors justify their actions by pointing to Io’s earlier capture.

Finally, the son of the Trojan king, Alexander (Paris), abducts Helen from her home in Sparta. At this point, according to the Persians, the Greeks gain culpability, for “…so far it had only been a matter of abducting women from one another, but the Greeks…took the initiative and launched a military strike against Persia.”2

While it is true that the Persians viewed this kind of rapacious activity to be illegal, they found the Greek reaction to Helen’s abduction odd because, “…it is stupid to get worked up about it....“ They viewed the Greek reaction to be unjust and “…date the origin of their hostility towards the Greece from the fall of Illium.” 3

After sourcing these opinions, and running through them, Herodotus gives his own opinion: forget the abductions; they are not the issue.


3 0
3 years ago
Please help! I need help matching these people with who discovered what. I need to match a person with every word under the list
4vir4ik [10]

Answer:

Heliocentric - Copericus

Liquids under pressure - Blaise Pascal

Human circulatory system - William Harvey

Internal Organs structure - Vesalius

Scientific Method - Francis Bacon

Water synthesis - Cavendish

Planetary motion - Johannes Kepler

Barter System - Jason Smith

Laisse-Faire Economics - Adam Smith

Telescope - Galileo

Laws of Gravity - Isaac Newton

Geocentric - Plato

Mastery of Nature - Martin Luther

Ptolomic - Ptolomey

Gas and Pressure - Robert Boyle

Comets - Maria Winkelman

Rationalism - Rene Descartes

Gunpowder - ??? Sorry I couldn't get this one. I couldn't find anything besides Ancient China

Deism - John Calvin

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
In what way were nazis and fascists alike
Goshia [24]
Nazis were fascists themselves, giving them both the same characteristics.
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What led to the case of Marbury v. Madison?
    12·2 answers
  • what controversial issue did the US Supreme Court contend with when deciding the cases Furman V Georgia (1972) and Gregg V Georg
    6·1 answer
  • When the Republican Party was founded, what was its position on slavery
    8·2 answers
  • Two important cities of early Indian civiliation were Harappa and
    11·1 answer
  • Which government agency was created in response to Cold War confrontations?
    12·1 answer
  • What was the first thing the emperor of Hadrian tried to prevent?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following groups controlled Saint-Domingue's government before the Haitian Revolution?
    10·2 answers
  • What can affect a person internation of events
    12·1 answer
  • Why did Americans outnumber the Tejanos in Texas? I need help asap hhh
    15·1 answer
  • What is not considered technology in Ancient civilizations?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!