Answer:
Neither parallel nor perpendicular
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm assuming you meant line k is y = 3x -2. If not, this is wrong.
For this, you need to put both lines in point-slope form, or the form that line k is already in. This means you only need to convert line m.
-2r + 6v = 18
6v = 2r + 18
v = 2/6r + 18/6
v = 1/3r + 3
Now you can answer the question.
To be parallel, lines must have the same slope (but a different y-intercept). 3 and 1/3 are not the same, so the lines are not parallel.
To be perpendicular, one line must have the opposite reciprocal (fraction flipped and + goes to - or - to +) of the other. While 3 is the reciprocal of 1/3, they are both positive, so they are not perpendicular.
To be the same line, the equations must be absolutely identical, which they aren't.
This leaves the last option: neither.
Let me know if you need a more in-depth explanation of anything here! I'm happy to help!
If you look at all 4 of these tables. Exponential means a large increase or gradual increase so. With that in mind if you look at table 1, the y column only increases by 5. For B, the y column only increases by 1. For C, the y column increase by 4 then 8 then 16 then 32. Therefore it is exponential. For D it is consistently an increase of 8.
Hope this helps!
<span>E[Y] = 0.4·1 + 0.3·2 + 0.2·3 + 0.1·4 = 2
E[1/Y] =0.4·1/1 + 0.3·1/2 + 0.2·1/3 + 0.1·1/4 = 0.4 + 0.15 + 0.0666 + 0.025?0.64
V[Y] =E[Y2]-E[Y]2= (0.4)·12+(0.3)·22+(0.2)·32+(0.1)·42-22= 0.4+1.2+1.8+1.6-4= 5-4 = 1</span>
Answer:
Option C, 30
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step 1: Identify how many people spent $200</u>
There was only 30 people that spent $200
Answer: Option C, 30
Answer:
65
Step-by-step explanation:
So we have the expression:
And we want to evaluate it for m=25.
So, substitute 25 for m:
Subtract:
Multiply:
Add:
So, our answer is 65.
And we're done!
