Hazirah can legally claim the remaining balance of Intan's debt because there was no acceptance of the offer from Johan that the part-payment should serve as full settlement.
<h3>What is the law of contract?</h3>
The law of contract deals with the enforcement of promises when certain elements are present. These contract elements include offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention.
Intan should remember that a valid and enforceable contract has conditions. We cannot claim there is an implied acceptance of Johan's offer. Johan cannot modify the contract terms between Intan and Hazirah because he was not a party to the contract.
Lastly, Johan did not offer any consideration for Hazirah to forfeit the balance of RM5,000. And Hazirah remained silent during Johan's informal negotiations without communicating her acceptance.
Thus, there was <u>no </u><u>contract</u><u> </u>between Johan and Hazirah, and Intan should do well to repay the balance.
Learn more about the elements of a contract at brainly.com/question/8116487
When scholars and justices interpret the Constitution with the view that the courts should reject any active lawmaking functions and follow precedent, refers to Judicial Restraint.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The judicial branch is conferred with the power of interpretation of the law. Many times while exercising the power of judicial activism there is always a chance that justices may exceed their power. Hence, the theory of judicial restraint was evolved.
By judicial restraint, judges are encouraged to exercise their power with certain limits and to respect and follow stare decisis. This ensures that judges are not intruding into the realm of the legislature by involving themselves in law making.
Answer:
There are 435 seats split between the 50 states.
Explanation:
<u>State</u> <u># of Representatives</u>
Alabama 7
Alaska 1
Arizona 9
Arkansas 4
California 53
Colorado 7
Connecticut 5
Delaware 1
Florida 27
Georgia 14
Hawaii 2
Idaho 2
Illinois 18
Indiana 9
Iowa 4
Kansas 4
Kentucky 6
Louisiana 6
Maine 2
Maryland 8
Massachusetts 9
Michigan 14
Minnesota 8
Mississippi 4
Missouri 8
Montana 1
Nebraska 3
Nevada 4
New Hampshire 2
New Jersey 12
New Mexico 3
New York 27
North Carolina 13
North Dakota 1
Ohio 16
Oklahoma 5
Oregon 5
Pennsylvania 18
Rhode Island 2
South Carolina 7
South Dakota 1
Tennessee 9
Texas 36
Utah 4
Vermont 1
Virginia 11
Washington 10
West Virginia 3
Wisconsin 8
Wyoming 1
Total 435
1a(1) : a binding custom or practice of a community : a rule of conduct or action prescribed (see prescribe sense 1a) or formally recognized as binding or enforced by a controlling authority. (2) : the whole body of such customs, practices, or rules The courts exist to uphold, interpret, and apply the law.
Answer:
The search was lawful.
(Check Explanation).
Explanation:
The case that is described in the question above is similar to the case of New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981).
In this case of police searching without warrant, many people or let me say defendants do argue that their right under the fourth and fourteenth Amendment act has been violated.
The search was lawful because the defendant broke one of the traffic laws that is driving while being intoxicated. This give the officer the right to " impound" the defendant's car and search for possible evidence which is known as an inventory search.
