<span>(a) Which large areas were united under one ruler? Give at least three examples
Three large areas that were united under one ruler are the Roman empire, The Alexander Magnus Empire, and the Mongolian Empire. Those three represents three empires in the history of humanity that united under one ruler huge areas, that extended between continents and different countries throughout the Earth.
(b) Which rulers of dynasties, governments, kings, or emperors united large areas under one rule? Give at least three examples.
As for the Roman Empire, it was Julio Cesar who united the brought the Empire at the peak of its power. In the case of Alexander Magnus, it was him that took the Macedonian and Greek power outsider their border governing a huge area of territories. As for the Mongolian Empire, the principal ruler and conqueror was Genghis Khan, which united the tribes and extended the influnce of its country to new reaches.
(c) What are some strategies or practices rulers have used to unify diverse people in their empires under one rule? Cite at least three strategies or practices and mention some rulers or governments that used each of those strategies.
The principal strategy in the Roman Empire was divide and conquer. They divided the enemy army into small pieces and then defeat each of them separately. Alexander Magnus used a strategy that trapped the enemy army inside a pincer. Genghis Khan often </span><span>resorted to inciting internal revolt among the enemy supporters.</span>
Most of early history, these was no seperation of church and state, so they were one and the same.
This applies to both the English civil war ( if you can call any war civil) and the Dutch revolt. Both were to end Catholic domination of the Protasant subjects.
All wars are both religious and political. But end up anti-religious as they violate the very tenets of any religion they expound so it is only being about power.
Protasants revolted against the Catholics for freedom but then in-fighting over which Protasant religion is good.
The politics of any war are power and greed. Someone wants what someone else has and demands the right to take it and deny others taking it from them.
Many claim they are trying to protect the ' true' religion or claim for religious freedom and then show they are no better then the heritics they decry and deny others the same freedoms they want,
When all is said and done - all is just for power.
War has never settled any differences. It just pospones the reversal of power as will always happen. The French Revolution almost did by beheading the royals but as many escaped and Napolian brought new ones in. Nothing much changed.
The American revolution - which was the 1st non-religious war started the change for wars to not just be about religion.
Answer:
it would be 1,2,3 I hope this helps
The PPC (or PPF, same thing) shows economic growth because it outlines exactly what the economy can produce at that moment. When it shifts outward in any way (be it towards consumer and capital goods, or X and Y), that MUST be because of economic growth.
