1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hoa [83]
3 years ago
5

Why was the transfer of power after the election 1800 significant?

History
2 answers:
serious [3.7K]3 years ago
8 0
D :)))))))))))))))))))
Lina20 [59]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: Hope this helps :)

1. Why was the transfer of power after the election 1800 significant?

   - D. It set the precedent that the losing faction would accept the election results and help with a peaceful power transfer.

2. What was significant about Jefferson's 1801 inaugural address?

    - B. It was used to call for a more fair election process.

3. How did the ruling of McCulloch v. Maryland affect the federal government?

    - C. It increased the power of Congress to carry out its lawmaking duties.

4. How did Marbury v. Madison help balance the federal government in the United States?

    - D. It allowed the Supreme Court to check the actions of the other two branches through judicial review.

You might be interested in
Rome is best known for which achievements
Alex_Xolod [135]
The ancient Romans developed many new techniques for buildings and construction of all types including concrete, Roman<span> roads, </span>Roman<span> arches, and aqueducts. Public Health Programs: The Romans were great believers in healthy living. They made sure that all the people of </span>Rome<span> were able to get medical help.</span>
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The fundamental economic problem that all individuals and societies face is?
alex41 [277]

Good morning!

We run into scarcity because while resources are limited, we are a society with unlimited wants.

Have a wonderful day sir/ma'am!

5 0
3 years ago
HELP!!! Why is selective incorporation important?
Sholpan [36]

So big picture, selective incorporation, it's the doctrine where judicial decisions incorporate rights from the Bill of Rights to limit laws from states that are perceived to infringe on those rights, and the justification comes from the 14th Amendment.  It refers to the legal doctrine the U. S. Supreme Court has employed over the years to extend the rights guaranteed by the U. S. Constitution to the states. Through selective incorporation, the Court has ruled that states may not pass laws restricting many of the important rights enshrined in the Constitution.

Selective incorporation is a doctrine written into the Constitution that protects American citizens from their states' enacting of laws that could infringe upon their rights. Selective incorporation is not a law, but a doctrine that has been established and confirmed time and again by the United States Supreme Court.

The idea of selective incorporation dates to when the Constitution was being drafted, with the founding fathers heatedly debating the power of state governments versus the power of the federal government. In the end, the Constitution was signed and enacted without any definitive conclusion on the issue. In the 1833 case of Barron v. Baltimore, the Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights applied only to the federal government, meaning that states were able to pass their own laws violating the Bill of Rights without any intervention by the federal government.  It wasn't until 1868 that Congress passed the 14th Amendment, forbidding states from denying anyone the freedom to life, liberty, and property without due process, thus reversing the decision of Barron v. Baltimore.  Beginning in the 1920s, the Supreme Court ruled on many cases about the protection of the Bill of Rights within state laws. Selective incorporation is based on this approach to choosing which clauses of the Bill of Rights apply to state governments.  As the Supreme Court continued to rule on cases challenging state governments' ability to violate the Bill of Rights, justices began to debate the application of the 14th Amendment. Some felt that the amendment applied to the all amendments in the Bill of Rights, prohibiting states from the same violations as the federal government, while others felt that only portions of those basic rights should be incorporated. In the 1937 case of Palko v. Connecticut, the Court rejected total incorporation and adopted the doctrine of selective incorporation as well as the guidelines for applying it.

HOPE THIS HELPS :)

6 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes the beliefs of those that did not support Prohibition in the early 1900s?
Harlamova29_29 [7]
<span>The prohibition was known as the act of forbidding the sale and even manufacturing of alcohol in the US. The people who did not support the Prohibition claim that it actually takes away people's rights to buy alcohol. Which is why most who supported it were liberals, freedom fighters, and also alcoholics.  

</span>
4 0
3 years ago
How good is history why is it so important
masya89 [10]

Answer:

history is important because it helps us understand what happened in the past.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why were the 1920s referred to as the “Roaring Twenties?” Analyze the cultural and economic changes during this period
    9·1 answer
  • Without representatives in Parliament how did the Americans force the British to repel many of the new acts? Were they successfu
    9·2 answers
  • The Matter of France refers to _____.
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes the cause of the Great Depression? overproduction and under consumption
    8·1 answer
  • How did revival meetings bring new energy to reform churches during the Second Great Awakening?
    8·1 answer
  • What was the impact of political machines on us cities in the late 19th and early 20th centuries?
    11·1 answer
  • If these days are so tragic, why do we remember and learn about<br> them?
    6·2 answers
  • How did sugar shape early Spanish and Portuguese exploration
    9·1 answer
  • According to the article, why did Zitkála-Šá write "Side by Side"?
    7·1 answer
  • United States
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!