1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yanka [14]
2 years ago
11

Guys help me on this one please…

Mathematics
1 answer:
Ann [662]2 years ago
5 0

Answer: 6. 35 hours

7. 741 Miles

8. 1.5 or 1.54

Step-by-step explanation:

6. 142.20/6=23.7

829.50/23.7=35

7. 117/3=39

39x19=741

8.19/12.35=1.538

You might be interested in
Why is the accounting cycle important?
ankoles [38]
Because without it the economy would fail :)
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Part b compare the bond enthalpies of the nitrogen-nitrogen single and triple bonds. based on this information, what is the aver
s2008m [1.1K]
C-C bonds = 348 C=C bonds = 614 C(triple) bonds = 839 
All in KJ/Mol 
just do 839-614=225 and 614-348=266 
After a pi bond is added on, these two numbers are the KJ/Mol it takes to separate the C-C bond,  
To get the average: (225+266)/2 = 245.5Kj/Mol 
You might want to round your answer to 246KJ/Mol
5 0
3 years ago
Given the equation g(x)= – x2–5x + 12<br> find g(9)
Natasha2012 [34]

Answer:

g(9) = 48

Step-by-step explanation:

g(x)= – x2–5x + 12

<u>I'll assume this is </u>

<u>g(x)= – x^2–5x + 12</u>

find g(9)

find g(9)

g(9)= – 9^2–5(9) + 12

g(9)= 81–45 + 12

g(9) = 48

8 0
3 years ago
The mean number of hours per day spent watching television, according to a national survey, is 3.5 hours, with a standard deviat
aleksley [76]

Answer:

4.5 hour and 2 hour

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: The mean number of hours per day spent watching television, according to a national survey, is 3.5 hours, with a standard deviation of two hours.

To Find: If each time was increased by one hour, what would be the new mean and standard deviation.

Solution:

let the total numbers entries of hours in survey be   =   \text{N}

each entry in survey be  =  \text{x}_{i}

mean of survey is     =     \mu  =3.5 \text{hours}

standard deviation is  =   \sigma = 2 \text{hours}

if each entry in survey is increased by one hour then,

each new entry in survey  is =  \text{x}_{i}+1

the new mean is\mu_{new}  = \frac{\text{sum of all hours}}{total number of entries}

                                                \frac{\text{x}_{1} +1+\text{x}_{2}+1 +....+\text{x}_{N}+1 }{N}

                                                \frac{(\text{x}_{1} +\text{x}_{2} +....+\text{x}_{N})+\text{N}\times1 }{N}

                                                \frac{(\text{x}_{1} +\text{x}_{2} +....+\text{x}_{N})}{N}+\frac{\text{N}\times1 }{N}

                                             \mu_{new} = \mu + 1=4.5 \text{hours}

now,

standard deviation is      \sigma_{new}= \sqrt{\sum_{1}^{N}\frac{(\text{x}_{inew}-\mu_{new})^{2}}{N}}

                                   \text{x}_{inew}= \text{x}_{i}+1

                                   \mu_{new}=\mu+1        

putting values,

                                                \sqrt{\sum_{1}^{N}\frac{(\text{x}_{i}+1-\mu-1)^{2}}{N}}

                                                \sqrt{\sum_{1}^{N}\frac{(\text{x}_{i}-\mu)^{2}}{N}}= \sigma

                                 \sigma_{new}        =2

new mean and standard deviation are 4.5 and 2 \text{hours}

                                               

5 0
3 years ago
Suppose that 500 parts are tested in manufacturing and 10 are rejected.
alexdok [17]

Answer:

a) z=\frac{0.02 -0.03}{\sqrt{\frac{0.03(1-0.03)}{500}}}=-1.31  

p_v =P(Z  

If we compare the p value obtained and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of rejected items is less than 0.03.  

b) We can use a 95 percent upper confidence interval.

On this case we want a interval on this form : (-\infty,\hat p +z_{\alpha}\sqrt{\frac{\hat p (1-\hat p)}{n}})

So the critical value would be on this case Z_{\alpha}=1.64 and we can use the following excel code to find it: "=NORM.INV(1-0.05,0,1)"

We found the upper limit like this:

0.02+1.64\sqrt{\frac{0.02 (1-0.02)}{500}}=0.03026

And the interval would be: (-\infty,0.03026)

And since our value (0.02) is contained in the interval We fail to reject the hypothesis that p=0.03

Step-by-step explanation:

Part a

Data given and notation  

n=500 represent the random sample taken

X=10 represent the number of objects rejected

\hat p=\frac{10}{500}=0.02 estimated proportion of objects rejected

p_o=0.03 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.05 represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that 70% of adults say that it is morally wrong to not report all income on tax returns.:  

Null hypothesis:p=0.03  

Alternative hypothesis:p < 0.03  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.02 -0.03}{\sqrt{\frac{0.03(1-0.03)}{500}}}=-1.31  

Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided \alpha=0.05. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a one tailed left test the p value would be:  

p_v =P(Z  

If we compare the p value obtained and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of rejected items is less than 0.03.  

Part b

We can use a 95 percent upper confidence interval.

On this case we want a interval on this form : (-\infty,\hat p +z_{\alpha}\sqrt{\frac{\hat p (1-\hat p)}{n}})

So the critical value would be on this case Z_{\alpha}=1.64 and we can use the following excel code to find it: "=NORM.INV(1-0.05,0,1)"

We found the upper limit like this:

0.02+1.64\sqrt{\frac{0.02 (1-0.02)}{500}}=0.03026

And the interval would be: (-\infty,0.03026)

And since our value (0.02) is contained in the interval We fail to reject the hypothesis that p=0.03

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Two numbers total 48 and have a difference of 26. find the two numbers
    5·1 answer
  • Half a number increased by seven is -2 find the number.
    13·1 answer
  • A fair die is rolled repeatedly. find the expected number of rolls until all 6 faces appear.
    6·1 answer
  • Alex walked 1 mile in 15 minutes. Sally walked 3,520 yards in 24 minutes. In miles per hour, how much faster did Sally walk than
    14·1 answer
  • Which expression is equivalent to (f9)(5)?
    11·1 answer
  • Simplify the expression. a^-5 b-4/a^-13 b^8​
    5·1 answer
  • 11. A regular polygon has an interior angle sum of 1260°. Solve for n, the number of sides of the polygon.
    12·1 answer
  • Find the area of the figure. (Sides meet at right angles.)
    13·2 answers
  • A home has a triangular backyard. The second angle of the triangle is 4º more than the
    15·2 answers
  • 5
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!