1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dovator [93]
2 years ago
12

Listening is more complex than hearing. TRUE OR FALSE.

English
2 answers:
IgorLugansk [536]2 years ago
4 0

Answer: The answer is true.

Explanation: Listening is different than hearing because it involves much more than the reception of sound by the ear. More than a one-way flow of information from someone's mouth to another person's ears, it is much more complicated. That's why it is so frequently overlooked. It takes great and constant effort.

torisob [31]2 years ago
3 0
True
.....................
You might be interested in
Please please give answer
soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer:

A shocking

Explanation:

hope it helped you in any way

6 0
3 years ago
create a public service announcement for school age children to help them avoid illnesses caused by bacteria. cite a minimum of
Sergio [31]
Um i would do age 7-13 and the evedence i dont know ill get back to you on that in about 3-6 minuits ok.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the excerpt from Act IV, scene iv of Romeo and Juliet.
liubo4ka [24]
This scene takes place after Juliet has been found dead. The answer is that they feel it is too sad a day to play any music.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please answer this question please !!
TEA [102]
Cause hes black and she really didnt know him.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In about 100 words, discuss two themes that are shared by both "The Indian Burying Ground" and "The Wild Honeysuckle" and that b
vladimir2022 [97]

AT the very outset of any discussion of the beginnings of American literature we are met by the pertinent query, Is there really an American literature distinct from English? Such a question can be answered only by reminding ourselves what literature is. Here Dean Stanley’s definition is helpful:

          “By literature I mean those great works … that rise above professional or commonplace uses, and take possession of the mind of a whole nation or a whole age.” 1

 1

 With such a definition, for a test it would be absurd to deny that the work of Poe, of Emerson, of Hawthorne, of Lowell, of Whitman, and of other writers of the nineteenth century were contributions to belles-lettres that were distinctively American. Their work unquestionably was the record of the thoughts and feelings of men who are interpreters of American life and who mirror the prevalent tendencies of their time—work that, in Dean Stanley’s phrase, takes possession of the mind of a whole nation. If it be granted that there was, and is, an American, as distinct from an English literature, then its beginnings in the Colonial and Revolutionary periods are of interest and importance.   2

 

Literature of the Colonial Period (1607–1765)

 American literature, in the strictest sense, as comprising only books that are still generally read, is only about one hundred and fifty years old. Including its period of preparation, however, it is more than three hundred years old. The Colonial period extends from 1607, the year of the founding of the Jamestown Colony, to 1765, the year of the Stamp Act, and the first stirring of political revolt. In its beginnings, therefore, it was contemporary with the great accomplishment of the Elizabethan age in England. When Jamestown was settled in 1607, Spenser had been dead only eight years, Shakespeare was doing his greatest work, Raleigh was writing in the Tower his ‘History of the World,’ and Bacon was beginning his ‘Novum Organum.’ The first books written here in America were contemporary with Shakespeare’s plays, the first books printed here were contemporary with Milton’s, and the first authors born here were contemporary with Dryden and Defoe.   3

 Though the great books produced in England were read and admired on this side the water, they did not excite much emulation. Not in America were the great books written. Indeed few books of any kind were produced. The records of the voyages and first settlements, the diaries of the colonists, the sermons of the preachers, are all the Colonial period can show. The colonists were too busy making history to record it, too much occupied in turning a savage wilderness into a civilized country to find leisure for the cultivation of the muses. What little writing was done was in no sense American. Our early writers followed, albeit afar off, the British authors they knew both in theme and method. They looked at life through British spectacles, and failed to produce anything distinctively American.   4

 The two centres of literary activity were, naturally, Virginia and Eastern Massachusetts. To the former belongs the credit of having made the first contribution to Colonial literature. The first American book was Captain John Smith’s ‘A True Relation of such Occurrences and Accidents of Noate as hath hapned in Virginia since the first planting of that Colony.’ This book was printed in England in 1608, and was followed by the ‘General History of Virginia’ in 1624. The latter, which was both written and printed in England is an expanded narration of the same incidents recorded in the ‘True Relation.’ Neither the ‘True Relation’ nor its sequel have added anything to Smith’s reputation for veracity. Indeed he ranks with Defoe as one of the most picturesque and entertaining liars in all our literary annals. What he attempted, and succeeded admirably in doing, was to furnish a vivid and, therefore, interesting romance of life in Colonial Virginia. He wrote to satisfy the craving for excitement on the part of the gullible British public, ready to credit anything, even the preposterous Pocahontas story, provided it were localized in the land Michael Drayton (in his poem ‘Virginia’) had affirmed to be “Earth’s only paradise.”

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 50 POINTS I need someone to Peer review and edit this paragraph!!!
    12·1 answer
  • Read the citation below, which is from a computer file.
    14·2 answers
  • What changes have the years brought to animal farm
    7·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt below and answer the question. Was this the face that launched a thousand ships And burnt the topless towers of
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following words requires dropping the last letter and adding ves to make it plural? Bluff Wildlife Knockoff Half
    8·2 answers
  • Read the passage below and answer the question.
    7·2 answers
  • Help!! Help!!
    7·1 answer
  • Based on content and the definition above, what
    14·1 answer
  • Please help, thanks in advance. :)
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME!!!I AM ABOUT TO EXPLODE!!I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 45 POINTS!!!
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!