Answer:
a)
To my view, the MD viewpoint is better. In companies the existing process is usually analyzed and the pain points identified whenever there is a need for change. The new system is simply a change to the existing system. The stakeholders' specific needs are not completely addressed. The MD calls for a collection of and analysis of demands from scratch to share its needs , requirements and inhibitions between the principal stakeholders. The CIO and their staff would be able to assess in the requirements review process what worked and what did not work well for the organization.
In assessing the current process, the CIO and his team will align their thinking process with the pain points and correct the existing system. They are not going to build the system in a fresh light. A new system that meets the needs of stakeholders can be developed. For everybody, this is a win-win situation. The point of view of MD is therefore more logical and related.
b)
In the particular case, the most logical and comprehensive system analysis method is:
Primary stakeholder requirements collection: Primary stakeholders using the system must be consulted on their specific requirements and needs. It is also necessary to consider the limitations identified by stakeholders.
Comprehension of existing system and pain points: the current system can be analysed based on requirements collection and pain points can be emphasized in the current system.
A new system that will win for everyone: the new system must primarily comply with the needs of the stakeholders.
Presentation and approval of the system blueprint to stakeholders
Development and implementation of the system: system development can be carried out by the agile method of sprinting.
Monitoring and control of the system: to check for performance deviations, the system implemented should be observed. In order to monitor deviations, specific intervention can be implemented.
Answer:
A) True
Explanation:
The Homestead strike was a combination of both a company lockout (the company didn't allow workers to work) and a union strike (where the workers did't want to work). It was a power struggle between one of the darkest and sinister monopolists of the 19th century, Carnegie Steel (led by Andrew Carnegie) and the most powerful workers' union in America, the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steel Workers.
In 1889 the union won, but Carnegie wanted revenge, so in 1892, he demanded harsher conditions after the initial contract was over and when the union said no, a lockout started. It was bloody and messy, with 16 dead. Carnegie's private army of 300 guards faced 10,000 strikers and things turned ugly soon. The Pinkertons (Carnegie's troops) were "defeated" but too many lives were lost.
Since Carnegie's little was defeated, he asked a bigger fish to help him and the governor sent 8,000 soldiers to arrest any union striker that opposed Carnegie. Finally, Carnegie's millions and corrupt politicians won, and the workers were forced to accept lower wages and more working hours. Those who rejected the forced deal were sent to prison.
Answer:
B. Income Tax Expenses
Explanation:
The Purpose of the Income Statement in Financial Statement Preparation is to ascertain the profit or loss of a business entity for a particular year. Usually, the format is as follows:
1. Gross Profit= Sales- Cost of Goods sold(Opening Inventory + Purchases- Closing Inventory)
2. Net Profit/ Net Loss = Gross Profit + Other Revenues and Gains - Expenses for the period.
However, income tax expense is only calculated when the net profit has been ascertained. It is usally referred to as net income before tax. It is based on this figure, that the income tax expense is then calculated based on prevailing income tax percentage.
Every other part of the income statement covers a section, but all sections should be calculated and concluded before the income tax expense can be calculated and then subtracted to arrive at the final income tax.
Answer:
![\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}& &September&October&November\\&$sales&6000&6800&5600\\&$Desired ending&4760&3920&4270\\&$Total Needs&10760&10720&9870\\&$beginning&4200&4760&3920\\&$Production Requirement&6560&5960&5950\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccccc%7D%26%09%26September%26October%26November%5C%5C%26%24sales%266000%266800%265600%5C%5C%26%24Desired%20ending%264760%263920%264270%5C%5C%26%24Total%20Needs%2610760%2610720%269870%5C%5C%26%24beginning%264200%264760%263920%5C%5C%26%24Production%20Requirement%266560%265960%265950%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
MISSING INFORMATION ATTACHED
Explanation:
The sales forecasted plus the desired ending inventory is the complete needs the sales department expect to be fullfill
Then, as the company has a beginning invneotry each period a portion of this needs is already fullfil thus, the difference are the production requirements.
Answer:
The opportunity cost of each pipe and what is the sunk cost is $77 and $67 per pipe respectively.
Explanation:
Opportunity cost: The opportunity cost is that cost which is incurred to choose the best options with the available options.
Sunk cost: The sunk cost is that cost which is not recovered in the future. Its other name is the past cost. It does not help to make future decisions as if it is incurred then it cannot be recovered again
So, the opportunity would be the current price i.e $77
And, the sunk cost is $67 per pipe ($77 - $10)
