1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vovangra [49]
2 years ago
12

Kiss marry kill: Giyuu Sanemi Shinobu

History
1 answer:
kumpel [21]2 years ago
4 0

Answer

yes indeed

Explanation:

You might be interested in
(a) Briefly describe ONE specific historical similarity between the United States settlement of the Northwest Territory and the
Neko [114]

Answer and Explanation:

a. A historical similarity was the increase in the size of the USA. This promoted a larger and more imposing territory on the world stage, but it also presented disadvantages such as some problems in managing such a large territory and government spending, which were resolved over time.

b. A historical difference was that the Northwest Territory was obtained through a treaty with strictly political objectives, on the other hand, the acquisition of Louisiana was made through a purchase, which in addition to also having political objectives, imposing a federal expense.

c. One of the main differences is that Louisiana was sold by the French government, which encouraged a whole period of adaptation of the place to American culture and politics. On the other hand, the northwestern territory established a territorial difference due to the existence of civil freedom and freedom of blacks.

6 0
2 years ago
According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In The Federalist #10, what is James Madison talking about, which is a cornerstone to the governments of each
Natasha_Volkova [10]

The correct answer is Madison is showing the superiority of a republic over a democracy

Explanation: He was called the "Father of the Constitution," Madison said the document was not "a single brain product" but "the work of many heads and many hands".

In Congress, he helped draft the Bill of Rights. And from his opposition to Hamilton's financial proposals, the Republican or Jeffersonian Party developed.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The image depicts the eruption of Mount Vesuvius which occurred in AD 79. It was painted with oil on canvas by an unknown artist
schepotkina [342]

Answer:

It was created after the event took place

Explanation:

There are two types of sources in history, primary and secondary.

Mount Vesuvius erupted in AD 79 while the painter painted it on the oil canvas in 1812. The painter was not present during the event, the painting is an imaginary depiction of the eruption, so it is a secondary source.

If the same painting was created by someone who was present when the volcano erupted, then it would have been considered as primary source.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
the prosperity of the boom years led to the extravagant lifestyles for the wealthy which eventually led to the collapse of the w
hoa [83]
The ansawer is goinHome  Economics  Encyclopedias almanacs transcripts and maps  Causes of the Great Depression<span>TOOLS </span>Causes of the Great DepressionGreat Depression and the New Deal Reference Library 
COPYRIGHT 2003 The Gale Group, Inc.Causes of the Great DepressionThe period from 1920 to 1929 is known as the Roaring Twenties. Those years were exciting, fascinating, and entertaining for the U.S. population, whose sons had just fought and won World War I (1914–18), the war that had promised to end all wars. Everyone was enthralled with the new gasoline automobiles that Henry Ford (1863–1947) had made affordable. Women had gained the right to vote, and some had acquired new electric machines that made life easier, such as washing machines and vacuum cleaners. Every day more Americans brought a radio into their homes; the radio brought music and news that thrilled listeners. The new moving pictures captivated audiences in palace-like movie houses. Businesses and manufacturing industries continuously expanded. The prices of their stocks steadily increased through the 1920s, going on a wild ride upward between 1926 and October of 1929. Stock prices went far beyond realistic values and had little basis in the health of the companies. These skyrocketing stock prices signaled<span> </span>g to be 
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the lasting legacy of W. E. B. Du Bois?
    7·1 answer
  • What drove Quanah Parker to fight so hard against the United States?
    12·2 answers
  • The official title of the marshall plan was "the __________."
    12·1 answer
  • Help please ! asap
    8·1 answer
  • Essay about operation overlord
    9·2 answers
  • how was the enlightenment idea of checks and balances reflected in the U.S. government after the american revolution?
    11·1 answer
  • What dangers did the slaves fce s they travled through the underground railroad?
    5·1 answer
  • What is 93÷7 and please show working​
    10·1 answer
  • What inspired Renaissance humanism?
    13·1 answer
  • Why might Arnold have felt overlooked and resentful towards other American leaders
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!