Egypt and Ethiopia. They were part of the British empire in the 1800s
Answer:
Craik and Lockhart would say that Abraham must ahve used the deep -or semantic- level of processing while encoding the event.
Explanation:
In 1972, Fergus I. M. Craik and Robert S. Lockhart identified the<u> levels-of-processing effect</u> that makes reference to the memory recall of stimuli in terms of the depth of a mental process.
There are two main levels of processing: <u>shallow processing</u>, which has to do with fragile memory, and <u>deep processing</u><u>,</u> that involves a more durable memory trace.
<u>Deep processing</u> can occur when the person relates the object or situation to something else, when the meaning of something is thought of or when the person processes the importance of the object or situation. At the same time, <u>deep processing</u> can retain memories by repeting information, by analyzing it in a deeper way or by making distinctions between the items involved. All these elements would be present in Abraham's case.
Answer:
Boundary crossing
Explanation:
A boundary-crossing, by contrast, refers to a helpful extension beyond the confines of the consulting rooms. For example, accompanying a patient with agoraphobia for shopping in a mall for instance. Principles of the beneficiary, maleficence, faith, trust compassion are the core component of the doctor patients relationship in therapeutic settings. There is a variety of reasons for boundary-crossing. The psychologist or practitioner exploitation, emotional ignorance, moral weakness and are similar factors for the boundary issues resulting in sexual or nonsexual issues. It is the moral duty of a practitioner that he will take care of the suffering patients with a sense of commitment and without damaging the ethical values of a person or practice settings. The behavior of a practitioner towards his or her patients should b consistent in all situations. He is to be bound to the Hippocratic oath. Oath is an oath that is taken by all practitioners during their course.
Television impacted politics in all of these ways except <span>forcing politicians to be honest because they were speaking directly to the American public on air.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
</span>
