Answer:
No. In an 8-1 decision authored by Chief Justice Morrison Waite, the Court concluded that the relevant sections of the Enforcement Act lacked the necessary, limiting language to qualify as enforcement of the Fifteenth Amendment. The Chief Justice first stated that the Fifteenth Amendment "does not confer the right of suffrage upon any one," but "prevents the States, or the United States, however, from giving preference…to one citizen of the United States over another on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." In examining the language of the Enforcement Act, the Court noted that, while the first two sections of the act explicitly referred to race in criminalizing interference with the right to vote, the relevant third and fourth sections refer only to the "aforesaid" offense. According to the Court, this language does not sufficiently tailor the law to qualify as "appropriate legislation" under the Enforcement Clause of the Fifteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
Answer:
Shaykh Mansa Musa (RA) held great influence to Islam in Mali, because during his reign he had made conquests west of Mali, capturing all of the Ghana Empire's land, and reaching the Western coast of Africa. Mamluk Imams and leaders visited him and consulted him, he also imposed Shari'a (Islamic law) on his lands, and supported it's culture and encouraged scholarship in Islam. He also donated massive amounts of wealth to the Mamluk sultanate.
Explanation:
BTW, you don't have to include the RA or the Shaykh, they're just Islamic honorifics.
Answer:
Explanation:The Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment, however, is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law.
Answer: The Sedition Act of 1918 curtailed the free speech rights of U.S. citizens during World War I
Explanation:
