According to Gibbons v. Ogden, a state <u>can not interfere with the power of congress to regulate commerce.</u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
The case of Gibbons and the Ogden was presented in the Supreme Court in the United States of America. It was in the year 1824 and was one of the most important cases of that time.
According to this case, a principle was established and it established a legislative enactment. According to this, a state could not interfere in the power of the congress and the power that was talked about in this principle was about interfering with the regulation of the commerce. It was only in the hand of the congress and not with the states.
Answer:
B)
She was Justinian's close advisor and influenced the laws
Explanation: I have this exact question on my midterm rn in Gwinnet co and I chose that
The contraction of will not is won’t
C! The whole purpose of the revolution was to dramatically decrease the power of the monarchy and increase the rights of the people.