Answer:Oliver Goldsmith’s essays reflect two significant literary transitions of the late eighteenth century. The larger or more general of these was the beginning of the gradual evolution of Romanticism from the Neoclassicism of the previous one hundred years. Oppressed by the heavy “rule of reason” and ideas of taste and polish, readers of this transitional period gradually began to respond more to the imaginative and the emotional in literature. This transition serves as a backdrop for a related evolution that played an essential role in the development of the modern short story. At this time the well-established periodical essay began a glacially slow movement away from its predominant emphasis on a formal exposition of ideas; contemporary essayists, none more prominent than Goldsmith, began to indulge more their taste for the personal approach and for narrative. The result was increased experimentation with characterization, story line, setting, and imagery; concurrent with these developments, style, theme, tone, and structural patterning received particular attention. Varying degrees and types of emphasis on these elements pushed the essay form in many diverse directions. Of all the contemporary essayists, Oliver Goldsmith best reflects these developments.
Explanation:
The top because it is was floating and then it started slowly sinking
You didn’t give enough context, and I don’t see the statements, therefore I cannot help you with your answer.
B. depth
Having depth means the opposite of being superficial. To get a measure of depth, one must measure in a downward manner. (for the ex: to measure the depth of the Caribbean Sea, we need to measure from the surface to the floor. That would be our depth measure).
Hello!
If I'm supposed to answer with "Fragment" or "Punctuated Correctly", "Punctuated Correctly" Is the answer because this sentence "The water balloon fight was a huge success"... etc. is correctly punctuated.
