Answer: The site of an ancient battle.
Answer:
29
Explanation:
Brake it down- 10+10=20, 20+9=29.
Answer:
Debra Medina claimed that nullification was possible by state laws that could neutralize federal laws. She based her claim on the 10th Amendment, which establishes that any power not constitutionally granted to the federal government can be held by the states.
Explanation:
The Constitution doesn´t enable the nullification of federal laws by the states, and several academics have stated that it could be illegal since the Supremacy Clause pronounces federal laws as the supreme national law. So nullification would overthrow the constitutional interpretation held for 200 years.
Let us also remember that Gov. Rick Perry, who supported nullification, had already skipped the nullification issue by starting a debate about secession. This debate is a reminder of the time when state rejection of racial integration had to be stopped by the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
Answer:
The correct option is: B. People with these disorders exhibit a personality style that differs markedly from the expectations of their culture
Explanation:
Dissociative disorders are defined as the medical condition caused by some form of psychological stress or trauma and are characterized by breakdown or disruption of self awareness, memory, perception or identity of an individual.
Dissociative disorders includes Dissociative identity disorder, Dissociative amnesia, Dissociative fugue, Dissociative seizuresm, Depersonalization disorder.
<u>Therefore, option B. is false of dissociative disorders.</u>