Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
This is mainly opinionated, and since I'm young I may be wrong.
I say it's good to motivate them because then they will do a better job at their task and will make you seem like a good boss/person, especially if it's a decent pay that will keep them being able to live. With the motivation, they might even remember more things (Such as: If you work at a gas station, you remember to upsell people when a deal is going on, whereas unmotivated people forget or just don't want to do it and be lazy). It's the same effect of giving a kid a piece of candy for being good, doing chores, or getting a harder question right.
<span>Market segmentation is the process of dividing a larger market into smaller groups (segments). </span><span>Marketers segment broad markets into smaller target segments based on a variety of</span> based on meaningfully shared characteristics.
These characteristics can be behavioral, geographic and demographic.
What are the options and I’ll tell you when you comment on mine when
Answer:
The correct answer is option ii.
Explanation:
In the case of imposition of tax on a good, the suppliers will bear the greater share of burden if the demand is more elastic than the supply.
The imposition of tax leads to an increase in the price of the product. If the demand is more elastic, the quantity demanded will decrease to a greater extent with the increase in price.
The supply being less elastic will change to a smaller extent, thus a greater tax burden will be borne by the suppliers.
