The work of Max van Mamen and Shaun Gallagher on phenomenology theory influenced the classroom practice because they allows to focus on appearances and phenomenas.
<h3>What is phenomenology?</h3>
This refers to the philosophical study of the structures of experience and consciousness, that is, the study of appearances of things or experience in the way they happens.
The philosophers Shaun Gallagher and Max van Mamen asserts the theory of phenomenology to be a mutual enlightenment between the philosophy and empirical science.
Read more about phenomenology
<em>brainly.com/question/14268210</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
In my opinion, the United States does not follow this doctrine, although there are no longer any cases of "new countries" if there is the case of strong countries, including the United States, and developing or third world countries, as there are in Latin America, where the United States has been accused of intervening:
- Support the coup d'etat of Pinochet in Chile under the government of President Nixon in 1973.
- Orchestrate the coup against Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala in 1984.
- Suppress protests in foreign countries as happened in Panama in 1964 under the mandate of President Johnson (APARICIO PINDADO, Daniel. 2016).
As well as the constant invasion of Middle Eastern countries in the search for nuclear weapons or terrorist groups that could threaten US sovereignty, as well as the recent friction with Iran.
Therefore, the inclusion of the United States as a strong country vis-à-vis other countries is undeniable and demonstrates that the Monroe doctrine (attributed to President James Monroe) is no longer applied by the country, at a time when more than ever countries should exercise their own government and be architects of its future.
Explanation:
The United States has been involved in different acts around the world that would suggest that the Monroe doctrine should only be applied when the country was a new or weak country, now that it is a strong country, it does not consider that doctrine applicable.
One of the main reasons there was a debate between the federal and state governments over the funding of transportation improvements was that "<span>B. transportation improvements were expensive", since it was difficult to figure out who would pay for what.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is A. A large number of feudal states governed by noble lords evolved into a handful of centralized monarchies ruled by kings.
Explanation:
The Eastern Zhou (770-256 BCE) and the Warring States Period (475-221 BCE) refer to an era of Chinese history that was marked by disintegration of the ancient Zhou dynasty, which had ruled China by several centuries before it decayed starting in the 5th century BCE, and following the partition of the Jin state, a series of states disputed control over China during the next two centuries. The most important of these were the Seven Warring States, which rose as a result of a <u>series of unifications where a large number of feudal small states governed by noble lords evolved into a handful of centralized monarchies ruled by kings by the 4th century</u>. Eventually, the Qing kingdom grew more powerful than the neighboring kingdoms, and between 247 and 221 BCE, the Qing conquered them all, ending the Warring States period and unifying China under its rule.
I would like to say C, because they were imperialistic power who sought out many colonies through out the world and they were heavily militaristic about these colonies. But I would wait for a second answer before you choose C, as I am unsure of this.