The correct answer is: scientific ideas, Freudian psychology, technological changes and new forms of transportation
During Modernism (1900-1930) artists and thinkers rebelled against every doctrine accepted by the Establishment.
While it exalted the mathematical scientific paradigm, to detriment of the metaphysical spirit dominant in the middle ages, Einstein's theory of relativity had demonstrated the limitations of science.
The industrial revolution had shown that technological changes caused social imbalances as well as poor living and working conditions, but innovations in the field of transportation and communication accelerated the daily life of the individual, placing movement as a factor that allows people to experience the changing world around them.
Freudian analysis of unconsciously repressed instincts revealed the lack of knowledge and control over human behavior.
Answer:
This sounds AMAZING!! If it were a book I would TOTALY read it!! This is AWESOME!! Keep it up :))
Explanation:
You didn't give the options. However, i'll try.
To me, a stone cannot be ethical because it cannot suffer. Indeed, the capacity for suffering must be satisfied before we talk about interest in a meaningful way. For instance, nothing we could possibly do for a stone could make a difference in its welfare. It don't have interest. Whereas, we, humans have interest. Therefore we can be ethical because we are sentient beings that can be benifited or harmed. It's because we can experience pain as a result.
Hope this helps !
Photon
