The detail that helps you illustrate the idea? is that the only question? I can answer that is there anything else you need me to answer in the paragraph?
Hello. You did not present the answer options, which makes it impossible for your question to be answered. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
In general, we can affirm that the detail that supports the definition shown in the question above, is that which presents the different ways of interpreting the American dream. To find this detail, you must read all the answer options and identify the one that shows how the American dream has different meanings and that this dream can be associated with many different things, not being something rigid and immutable, but something dynamic and adaptable to different realities.
The importance of religion
Answer:
I would say the correct answer is B. To give the English king a graceful way out of what could be an awkward situation.
Explanation:
The emperor's letter is a perfect example of a well-balanced political message. <u>He clearly states his political position while still paying due respect to his counterpart.</u> Translated to modern, everyday English, this passage would mean: "Your request is unreasonable and goes against all principles and rules of my great empire; still, I will be gracious enough to assume that you meant no offence." This way, <u>the emperor turns down a request without making an enemy</u>.
True, the emperor refuses King George's request to intensify trade connections between the two countries. But he doesn't go so far as to warn the English king of anything. His tone remains polite throughout the letter. Therefore, A) isn't correct.
On the other hand, C) isn't correct because Qian Long presents his current political stance and the politics of his empire as definite and immutable. Therefore, there is no room for change - not now, not ever.
Finally, D) isn't correct because the emperor knows very well that an ambassador always speaks on behalf of his sovereign. Therefore, it is absolutely impossible that a political envoy would take liberty to speak on his own terms.
<span>Does the torrent of </span>suffering ever abate —and can one possibly find any point in suffering<span />
