Answer:
My opinion is that it is fair that the Jewish People have a place to claim as their own, that is also their ancestral land, since they have been an errand people since the times of the Roman Empire, who have been expelled from many countries, and who have been subject to discrimination and poor treament.
However, it would also be fair that the Palestian Arabs have a share of the land too, because they were dwelling those land for more than a millenium before the Jewish began to settle back. This is why the most reasonable policy for the area would be a two state solution: one state for the Jewish People, and one state for the Palestinian Arabs.
Limited business affair control through the government and social reform
Answer:
Build a powerful militiary in Europe
Not sure but hope what I know help a little...Slavery was “an unqualified evil to the negro, the white man, and the State,” said Abraham Lincoln in the 1850s. Yet in his first inaugural address, Lincoln declared that he had “no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with slavery in the States where it exists.” He reiterated this pledge in his first message to Congress on July 4, 1861, when the Civil War was three months old.<span>Did You Know?When it took effect in January 1863, the Emancipation Proclamation freed 3.1 million of the nation's 4 million slaves.</span>
What explains this apparent inconsistency in Lincoln’s statements? And how did he get from his pledge not to interfere with slavery to a decision a year later to issue an emancipation proclamation? The answers lie in the Constitution and in the course of the Civil War. As an individual, Lincoln hated slavery. As a Republican, he wished to exclude it from the territories as the first step to putting the institution “in the course of ultimate extinction.”
