Answer:
If you're talking about Goldman's from "Address to the jury" then your answer is..
"to argue that the government’s case has been flawed from start to finish"
If not comment and lmk what you meant
In one study people who walked 15 minutes a day lost an average of two pounds per month is the answer
Answer:
B. Argument.
i think that's the answer.
Answer:
1. This is an expository article. This can be seen through the author's attempt to provide evidence to readers based on scientific and confirmed analyzes, where he literally exposes the topic in question, explaining it impartially and informing the reader.
2. The central idea is to expose the certainty that some Puritans have that they still exist and are influential in America, being part of American society.
3. To justify this perception of the Puritans, Hudson shows how the Puritans justify that many cultural points and customs present in America today are based on Puritan habits.
4. To explain a specific idea about Puritans believing they are still influential today, Hutson shows that many ideas from influential Puritans like Martin Luther and John Calvin are currently being encouraged, to confirm this, he shows that research has already been done with students from two universities that prove that the concepts of these two men are still taken seriously within society. I do not fully agree with Hutson's view because the research he cites in the article only represents a very small part of the population, which is not enough to represent American society.
Explanation:
please mark me brainliest.
Well the exposition is when Jeremy decides who his enemy is, and describes the details of his current life. Rising action includes his struggle to make an enemy list and talk to his enemy. The climax is when he decides that his enemy list is obsolete. Falling action is when he trashes his list and invites everyone for pie. Resolution: They eat pie. Even if I got the story wrong, all stories follow a suspense pattern that is similar.
