John C. Calhoun was an outstanding<span> U.S. </span>national leader and spokesperson <span>for the slave-plantation system of the </span>non modern<span> South. As a young legislator </span><span>from South </span>geographical region<span>, he helped steer the States</span><span> into war with kingdom</span><span> and established the Second Bank of the U.S</span>.<span>He was one of Jackson's Vice Presidents and was the creator of the idea of nullification.</span>
Andrew Jackson was the hero of Battle of New Orleans, and the Leader of new Democratic Party, he was liked by westerners and the "common man".
Henry Clay was the senator from Kentucky, he helped Adams in defeating Jackson, and was a great supporter of the Second Bank of the U.S, opponent of Jackson.
Answer:
After WWI the government changed the way they did propaganda to a way that helped them recruit soldiers for the military. It also helped raise spirits of the public during WWII. ... It started a new way of communication between the government and its people.
Explanation:
i think that it was alaska because hawaii was the last state i think
Signposts, internal previews and internal summaries are examples of linking statements.
<h3>What are signposts, internal previews and internal summaries?</h3>
The signposts, internal previews and internal summaries are a tool that allows the readers or audience to connect and understand the ideas that the speaker is using in his speech.
According to the above, it can be inferred that these tools are linking statements that help connect one thought to another in a speech.
Learn more about Signposts in: brainly.com/question/9374047
#SPJ1
In the summer of 1794, tensions between farmers and creditors in western Pennsylvania boiled over into violence. A group of armed farmers, calling themselves the "Associators," began to attack and seize the property of anyone they saw as an enemy. In response, President George Washington dispatched a force of 13,000 militiamen to put down the rebellion.
In a report to Congress, Alexander Hamilton described the events in Pennsylvania as an "insurgent" and "insurrection." By using these words, Hamilton was trying to downplay the seriousness of the situation and avoid calling it a full-blown rebellion. He may have also been trying to avoid provoking even more violence by using language that was less inflammatory.
The situation in Pennsylvania was eventually resolved without any major bloodshed. However, the episode showed how quickly tensions could boil over into violence in the early days of the republic. It also showed the importance of having a strong central government that was able to quickly put down any internal threats to the stability of the country.
