If you were delivering a speech advocating a change in the policy addressing child poverty, you would need to offer a plan to solve the problem.
Policy persuasive speech is a form of a persuasive speech given to persuade the audience whether or not to guide a coverage, candidate, or rule. value persuasive speech questions the morality of a problem, whether it is proper or wrong.
One cognizance of persuasive speaking is questions of policy, which advocates a trade from the reputation quo, or the way things are today. there is an "ought to", or at least an implied "must", inside the thesis declaration. The speaker wishes the plan proposed by way of the speech to grow to be coverage.
Learn more about Policy persuasive speech here brainly.com/question/9529909
#SPJ4
Explanation: Alice's Adventures in Wonderland has been translated into at least 97 languages, or as many as 174 languages. There have now been over a hundred editions of the book, as well as countless adaptations in other media, especially theatre and film. Characterized as "loving and gentle", "courteous to all", "trustful", and "wildly curious", Alice has been variously seen as clever, well-mannered, and sceptical of authority, although some commentators find more negative aspects of her personality. She is totally curious when she follows the white rabbit and drinks from a bottle that says drink me! The most obvious theme that can be found in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland is the theme of growing up.
Answer:
Total number of hazelnuts, almonds, and walnuts = 101 nuts
Total number of pistachios = 33
Explanation:
Step 1)
135 nuts = almonds + hazelnuts + walnuts
= 35 + 34 + 32
= 101
Step 2)
x pistachios = 135 nuts - (almonds + hazelnuts +walnuts)
= 135 - 101
= 33
∴ The total number of pistachios in the bag is 33.
n+1 + (3n + 5) = 134
4n + 6 = 134
4n +6-6 = 134 - 6
4n = 128
4n/4 = 128 /4
= 32
The lines which contain the element of foreshadowing are: This bodes some strange eruption to our state. He is literally saying that something weird is going to happen to Denmark.
As you can see, many people have an argument that cities are for people, not cars. I cannot tell what kind of question this is, so here we go. There is an ongoing argument that cities were designed for people, rather than cars. Cities seem to have been originally created for people, as the way they were designed shows that the building were intended to hold more people with less space. Now, there are countless roads scattered throughout countless cities that show the idea that cars getting through seems more important. There is a need for cars to get places quickly and easily, to help people to get to and from their jobs, homes, etc. I believe that cities were intended for both, as when people are able to live comfortably is smaller areas, there is more room for traffic. Hope this is something.