Answer:
The correct answer is option C. It is too vague.
Explanation:
The above sentence is ineffective because it is too vague. The reason is because it states some facts that do not entail anything. It does not say anything about how and for what have this person is qualified. And secondly it fails to explain the strengths and skills he portrayed and learned through the previous job due to which he was a good worker.
Therefore option C. It is too vague is the answer.
I find all of the answers pretty neutral (that is, giving only facts, no judgements) except on sentence 3: this is because of the word "sharply".
It seems that the author of this sentence makes a judgement about the split: that they're very split, that their argument was very intense. It seems like a judgement to me more than the other sentences.
Answer:
The early period of the Romantic era was a time of war, with the French Revolution (1789–1799) followed by the Napoleonic Wars until 1815. These wars, along with the political and social turmoil that went along with them, served as the background for Romanticism.
(Hope this helps, give a thanks if it did.)
Answer: they’re known for their uncommon imagery
Explanation:
