This question asks for an essay, which is a personal task that we cannot provide here. However, we can still develop some ideas that might help you in your work.
The House of Representatives can be considered both the people's branch and the insiders' branch. However, there is no question that the institution is now a lot more restrictive and less connected to the people than it was when the Framers designed it. Therefore, I would argue that it has become an insiders' branch.
First, legislators do not listen to constituents all the time. This is because each legislators has an enormous amount of constituents, all of which have very different characteristics. Moreover, legislators need to reconcile the interests of their constituents with those of other groups.
Second, the policymaking process makes it difficult for the public to monitor and evaluate the House. This is because common people do not have access to the necessary information to make this possible. Moreover, the process is long and complicated, and cannot be easily understood by all people.
Finally, partisan gerrymandering and polarization means that certain groups of constituents are much more important to a politician's career and support than others. This includes constituents in swing states, or constituents who support a particular party. Therefore, these constituents might see their interests represented more often than others.
Answer:
no. it did not
Explanation:
The aoc had a one house congress
Conflict theorists were critical of parsons's structural functionalist theory because they argued it presented <u>"an unrealistic image of consenus and harmony in society."</u>
Structural functionalism is the theoretical viewpoint that looks to comprehend the capacity that every part of culture plays in supporting the structure of a general public. In trying to do this, one of its fundamental premises is the possibility that people and culture work with a specific end goal to help the structure of their general public. As a structural functionalist, Parsons was, extremely keen on the possibility of social request. In the same way as other of his auxiliary functionalist cohorts, he held to the utilitarian hypothesis of stratification, the possibility that various leveled class frameworks and requests were essential for society to work.
Answer:
Magna Carta Libertatum (Medieval Latin for "Great Charter of Freedoms"), commonly called Magna Carta (also Magna Charta; "Great Charter"),[a] is a royal charter[4][5] of rights agreed to by King John of England at Runnymede, near Windsor, on 15 June 1215.[b] First drafted by Archbishop of Canterbury Stephen Langton to make peace between the unpopular king and a group of rebel barons, it promised the protection of church rights, protection for the barons from illegal imprisonment, access to swift justice, and limitations on feudal payments to the Crown, to be implemented through a council of 25 barons. Neither side stood behind their commitments, and the charter was annulled by Pope Innocent III, leading to the First Barons' War.
I hope I can help and I hope it is right.
The answer would be C. Extreme temperature variations
Moon's temperature always change from extremely hot to extremely cold following the change in lunar's day/night
In order to survive this extreme temperature, The Astronaut wear a custom made suit that maintain the temperature inside the suit
