All categories

2 years ago

Bond payments are generally more predictable than stocks because:_______.

1 answer:

4 0

The bond payments are more predictable than stocks because bond owners know the size and timing of payments they will receive.

Bonds refers to the promise by a borrower to pay the lender his/her principal and the interest on the loan given.

Bonds is an instrument used by company as an alternatives to taking a loan from banks.

Generally, the bond payments are more predictable than stocks because bond owners know the size and timing of payments they will receive.

Therefore, the Option C is correct.

You might be interested in

g An investor has invested $600,000 in a new rental property. Her estimated annual costs are $16,000 and annual revenues are $48

Tamiku [17]

Answer:

5.09%

Explanation:

The internal rate of return is the discount rate that equates the after tax cash flows from an investment to the amount invested.

IRR can be calculated using a financial calculator.

Cash flow in year 0 = $-600,000

Cash flow each year from year 1 to 29 = $48,000 - $16,000 = $32,000

Cash flow in year 30 = $32,000 + $500,000 = $532,000

IRR = 5.09%

To find the IRR using a financial calacutor:

1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.

2. After inputting all the cash flows, press the IRR button and then press the compute button.

I hope my answer helps you

5 0

3 years ago

Money provided by a third party to help students meet the costs of attending college. It can be provided by various agencies inc

artcher [175]

Answer:

Financial aid.

Explanation:

For American citizens, the dream is of going into higher education. but the tuition cost is very expensive as not everyone can offered such expensive fees for enrolling into a course. The different course has different fees. For supporting the people in their financials, many organizations like public, state, financial institutions help them.

So here in the given scenario, the financial aid is the best option fitted.

7 0

3 years ago

A manufacturing company has a standard costing system based on standard direct labor-hours (DLHs) as the measure of activity. Da

anzhelika [568]

Answer:

$940 Favorable

Explanation:

Fixed manufacturing overhead budget Variance = Budgeted fixed overhead cost - Actual total fixed manufacturing overhead cost

Fixed manufacturing overhead budget Variance = $71,500 - $70,560

Fixed manufacturing overhead budget Variance = $940 F

So, the fixed manufacturing overhead budget variance for the period is closest to $940 F

4 0

3 years ago

Your firm (an Australian firm) makes a sale to a Japanese customer. The sale price is 200 million Japanese Yen payable in exact

charle [14.2K]

Answer:

An Australian Firm Selling to a Japanese Customer

a) Direct Quote of the Exchange Rate between Australian Dollar and Japanese Yen:

A$ 1 = ¥90

Meaning 1 Australian Dollar = 90 Japanese Yen.

Therefore, the price of the goods would be A$ 2,222,222.22222 (¥200 million)/ ¥90

b)Theoretical Current Forward Exchange Rate, quoted in terms of JPY/AUD for delivery in three months:

= Spot Rate x (1 + Japanese Interest Rate) / (1 + Australian Interest Rate) x 360/90

= ¥90 x (1 +0.005) / (1 +0.03) x 360/90 = ¥90 x 1.005/1.03 x 360/90

= ¥351.26214 =A$1

c) The Australian firm can take advantage of any decreases in the exchange rate and also ensure that it receives at least Australian $2 million by entering into a Currency Forwards Contract.

d) If the spot exchange rate in 3 month's time is:

(i) AUD/JPY=150, the outcome of the hedging with a Currency Forwards Contract to get at least A$ 2 million would be the gain of:

Forward Exchange outcome in Australian Dollars = ¥200 million/ ¥150 =

A$ 1,333,333.33333

Hedging outcome minus Forward Exchange outcome

A$2 million - A$ 1,333,333.33333 = A$666,666.66667

(ii) AUD/JPY = 50, the outcome of the hedging with a Currency Forwards Contract to get at least A$ 2 million would be the loss of:

Forward Exchange outcome = in Australian Dollars = ¥200 million/ ¥50 =

A$4 million

Hedging outcome minus Forward Exchange outcome

A$2 million - $4 million = -A$2million

Explanation:

a) Currency forwards contracts and future contracts are used to hedge the currency risk. For example, a company expecting to receive ¥200 million in 90 days, can enter into a forward contract to deliver the ¥200 million and receive equivalent Australian dollars in 90 days at an exchange rate specified today.

b) If A$ 1 = ¥90

Therefore, the price of the goods would be A$ 2,222,222.22222 (¥200 million)/ ¥90 in Australian Dollars.

5 0

3 years ago

Janson Corporation Co.'s trial balance included the following account balances at December 31, 2021: Accounts receivable $14,000

11111nata11111 [884]

Answer:

$88,450 should be included in the current assets section of Janson’s December 31, 2021, balance sheet

Explanation:

Current Assets: The current assets are those assets which are converted into cash within one year.

Examples - Accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid insurance, cash, etc.

The computation of the total current assets is shown below:

= Accounts receivable + Inventory + Prepaid insurance + Short term investment

= $14,000 + $40,000 + $3,650 + $30,800

= $88,450

The amount of prepaid insurance which is given in the question is for two years. We have to compute for one year so we divide the total amount by number of years

= $7,300 ÷ 2 years

= $3,650

6 0

3 years ago