Answer:
goodness of fit- refers to the match between a child's temperament and the environmental demands with which the child must cope.
Explanation:
It should be understood that developmental psychology is known to be or can be described as a study that deals with how and why individuals change over the course of their life span. This aspect of psychology looks at how thinking, feeling, and behavior change throughout a person's life. And a person that study this aspect of psychology is being referred to as a developmental psychologist.
In this case, Monsena is showing a kind of development which she knows nothing about. Therefore, her mother was trying to guide her at that critical stage of development so that she won't be adversely affected. This means that, the mother is trying to fit the child's temperament with the environmental demands.
The supreme court meant that the whites and blacks would be 'separate but equal' meaning basically that they would have the same thing but they would be separated. the reason it was faulty was because they never showed the quality of the items or privileges that were given. the blacks could have some moldy disgusting putrid bathroom while the whites live in glamorous tiled clean bathrooms- but they would claim it's equal because they both have a bathroom.
Answer:
Yes and No
Explanation:
It all depends on how you view a resolve. Is it resolved if the illegitimate rulers are done away with and the people choose who they want over them? Or is it resolved if the people just adapt to the oppressive rulers and be content with the mental bondage?
So yes it can be resolved but it would more so be a compromise where no one is happy but it is essentially better for all those involved. Hope this helps.
I don’t know why it was so successful at that
Answer: a bridge of contract
Explanation:
A bridge of contract from the state government. Am I sure the state government before leasing out the land must have asked the company what they wanted to use the land for and for how many duration. It is obvious that duration of the agreement , I.e the duration by which the land was leased was not stated from the passage above but to draw conclusion ,the company will most likely charge the state government based on a bridge of contract agreement as they must have told the state government what they wanted to build and there must have been terms . am alsonsure that if the company actually knew that the government was going to build a bridge on that land in the coming few years, they wouldn't have invested so much in the land . so it a bridge of contract agreement.
