The first statement is Invalid Reasoning. Though a dog run would be a kind action towards dogs, it is not truly a valid point in justifying the construction of a dog run. It is not enough of a reason.
The second statement is also Invalid reasoning. The information is not relevant to the argument of building or not a dog run.
The third statement is Valid Reasoning. It states clearly an argument in favour of building a dog run.
The fourth statement is also Valid Reasoning. It explains a reason why the dog run is not really a priority, and would benefit only few citizens. It is a valid argument against the dog run
Answer:
The main subject of "Editha," one of William Dean Howells's most successful and best-known short stories, is war. Howells was very much opposed to war and especially the Spanish-American War, which he considered imperialistic. He shows his dislike in his portrayal of Editha, a thoughtless, selfish young woman, idealistic but ignorant of the consequences of war.
Because the work of literature is not right in front of me, I cannot be sure. But D sounds correct as the metaphor.
I think it’s probably D and B
I think the future will be awesome with more technology.
Its both good and bad, good that we will have more advantages but bad if people abuse them and rely on them too much.
No, no big event is going to happen, bad things are already happening now like the disasters happening in countries today so i would say its just going to get worse.
The future without oil will be bad, we use oil for food, cars, and more so without we're in big trouble but i hope we find a way.
I think the future looks like the picture i added below, a apocalypse where nothing good happens, i mean I'm not a dark person who sees the negative all the time but I'm wise enough to see the next step so i know its going to be bad.
Big invention? i hope to see flying cars and flying hoverboards that could improve transportation
*i take no credit for image below i just found it off google.