Which statements represent valid reasoning and which statements represent invalid reasoning?

2 answers:

7 0

The first statement is Invalid Reasoning. Though a dog run would be a kind action towards dogs, it is not truly a valid point in justifying the construction of a dog run. It is not enough of a reason.

The second statement is also Invalid reasoning. The information is not relevant to the argument of building or not a dog run.

The third statement is Valid Reasoning. It states clearly an argument in favour of building a dog run.

The fourth statement is also Valid Reasoning. It explains a reason why the dog run is not really a priority, and would benefit only few citizens. It is a valid argument against the dog run

scoundrel [369]4 years ago

4 0

Reasonable:

- Giving dogs more opportunity to run and play would be a kindness to these friendly, loyal, sensitive animals

- A recent poll found that the proposed dog run is supported by 75% of dog owners and 70% of those who don't own dogs

Unreasonable:

- My daughter gets scared when she hears dogs barking, so they should be kept behind a fence at a park

- Town leaders never listen to the concerns of dog owners because politicians tend to dislike animals

~Sarah Robinsen

You might be interested in

Part A

Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

you got tiktokk

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read the following excerpt of Muir's "Calypso Borealis" and answer the question.

Aleks04 [339]

The tone of the fragment can be classified as straightforward because it is a direct message (option d).

The tone of a text is a concept that refers to the way in which the author wants to convey the message. Generally, the texts have different tones to add character to the text and motivate the reader to engage with the text.

<h3>What is the tone of the fragment?</h3>

To identify the tone of the fragment we must read it carefully, pay attention to the language it uses and identify if it has words that can give us clues of the tone.

Taking into account the above, it can be inferred that the tone of the fragment is straightforward due to the fact that the author does not use complex language. On the contrary, the language is simple, clear and literal so that the receiver and the reader understand the message.

Note: This question is incomplete because the options are missing. Here are the options: