Napoleon supported many principles of enlightenment such as sovereignty, trial by jury, equality before the law, a citizen army, freedom of religion, abolition of feudal privileges, and freedom of the press.
Both Catholics and Protestants considered the <em>Malleus Maleficarum</em> (also known as <em>Hammer of Witches</em>) by Heinrich Kramer and Jacob Sprenger as an authoritative work on witchcraft.
This 1487-book it is considered by many as the most famous work of witchcraft ever written during. The book became an important source for Protestants and Catholics during the "fight" against witchcraft during the Inquisition.
The correct answer is A. If in the first box of the diagram the employee is giving an unfavorable opinion about his boss in a newspaper, and in the last box there is a judge ruling a sentence, the second box has to refer to a judicial issue. As the boss is the only one injured by the employee's declaration, he is the only one who can access justice regarding this issue, so the options are limited to A and C. The correct answer ends up being A, since when arguing libel, the boss can access justice by suing his employee, not if he defended him by saying that his statement was a symbolic speech.
Special slaves purchased for military service by the early Delhi sultans were called bandagan.
<h3>Who is a sultan?</h3>
Sultans were the rulers who governed their kingdom, they can also be termed, emperors. The word sultan is used in the Muslim culture.
There was special slave who was being taken by the Delhi Sultan, they were known as bandagan as these people are slaves were being specially transformed or being trained in how to manage our whole Kingdom.
These bandagan were sold for serving the military need of the sultans.
The Delhi Sultan would not hire any chief executive officer or higher level person but would appoint these places of the particular region who knew the rules and how to manage the place.
Learn more about Delhi sultans, here:
brainly.com/question/11366945
#SPJ4
Answer:
When faced with a question like this what you should do is read your answer for part A and then read the quote you chose for part B and see if the two add up to make a valid reasoning to support each other.
