Since the sentence of option B doesn't have the sync both the clauses to make it meaning, it contains error.
Answer: B
Explanation:
As we see option A, it seems meaningful as the animals sought shelter while the night drew near. Same case occur with option C and D as in option C, the trees are rustling due to the passing of brisk winds through their branches and in option D, stars will obviously appear brighter as the darkness grows.
But, in the option B, there is no co-ordination of both the clauses of the sentences. The disappearance of the Sun has nothing to do with the silence of woods in a direct manner. Although we can understand it indirectly that in the absence of natural light, animals might consider it as night and sought shelter. Since all other sentences have directly linked clauses, option B is showing indirect relation. Hence, it may be the desired answer as error.
Okay please Mark me brainliest answer
The first conflict in the story revealed a much larger conflict between the Duvitches by the other people who live on Syringa Street. The narrator's family befriends the Duvitches to resolve this conflict.
Answer: Option B.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The main clash in the story uncovered as a lot bigger clash between the temperatures by the others who lived in syringa Street the storyteller family becomes a close acquaintance with The Duvitches to spins the contention.
The first conflict in the story was really big because of which even when the main conflict was resolved, they were still on conflict for long. But to sort the matter out, the family of the narrator befriended the Duvitches.
Answer:
How are we here for two hours?
Explanation:
