The question provides us with the following scenario: "Neil and Zack are working on a project that requires both research and presentation. Neil is better at research, so he gives the presentation to Zack. " A comparative advantage is when an agent is better at something or can produce something at a lower cost. Here, Neil can do research better, so the answer is: A.) Neil doing the research
1. Evidence-based management seems like common sense initially, but the reality is not that simple. Managers are often hired based on their experience. Therefore, people tend to believe their word more than they would believe some types of concrete evidence. Moreover, even when evidence does not change, it can be interpreted in various ways by different people, making objectivity impossible.
2. Sometimes, evidence-based management might not be the best approach. This would especially be the case in situations where a manager might be very experienced. It might be better to trust the manager's interpretation of events as opposed to what the evidence might suggest.
3. It is unlikely that automated evidence-based management could ever fully replace human decision-makers. This is because automated managers might not be sensitive enough to human matters that are important for a correct interpretation of evidence.
4. I would want to work under this system, as ultimately the system is most likely to lead to efficient outcomes. Moreover, under this system, all workers are treated in the same way.
Credit card commercials do not show <u>2. People making </u><u>payments</u> for months or years on those credit card purchases.
<h3>What are credit card commercials?</h3>
Credit card commercials are the adverts placed on various media by credit card companies to entice individuals to sign on a credit card.
The commercials will show the great life of getting a credit card and making purchases convenient, including other enticements.
Thus, credit card commercials do not show <u>Option 2.</u>
Learn more about credit cards at brainly.com/question/2808739
<span>It is sometimes advantageous to hire from within because it is less costly, and helps maintain employee morale.
When you hire from within your company for a promotion or different position, it is often less costly because the employees are already trained in how the organization works. They won't have to spend money on her hirer information and ground level training. It also keeps the employees happy because they are able to see that there is potential for growth and by working hard in their current position they have a way to change positions and receive promotions. </span>
I believe the answer is D. update the records
