According to research, approximately<u> one half </u>of drivers who crashed after falling asleep did not detect any signs of drowsiness before crashing.
In the United States, drowsy driving is a serious issue. The risk, danger, and frequently deadly outcomes of driving when fatigued are concerning. Driving while sleepy or fatigued is known as drowsy driving. This typically occurs when a driver has not slept enough, but it can also occur as a result of untreated sleep disorders, drugs, alcohol usage, or shift employment.
Nobody can pinpoint the precise moment when sleep takes over their body. Although it is obviously harmful to fall asleep while driving, being sleepy still has an impact on your ability to drive safely. You become less able to pay attention to the road when you are sleepy. It impedes quick steering or braking responses and impacts your capacity to make wise decisions.
To learn more about drowsy driving here,
brainly.com/question/4607978
#SPJ4
Answer:
Research is practical and realistic because it is based on the scientific method, which demands that research should be start with an hypothesis, that should be falsifiable (meaning that it can be proven right or wrong), followed by a scientific study in which the hypothesis is tested.
If the hypothesis is proven to be true, it does not mean that is conclusions will hold true for eternity, they could be proven wrong by further studies.
For this reason, research is both practica, because it is based on a practical method: the scientific method, and realistic, because it has a limited scope, and limited, verifiable understanding of reality, and can be proven wrong with other studies.
Answer: professional criticism
Explanation:
Answer:
1.The closing of the Suez Canal by Egypt in 1956.
2.The OPEC oil embargo in 1973.
Explanation:
Most of the world's oil reserves and supply come from the Middle East. It is estimated that about 64.5 % of the world's oil supply is from the Middle East nations, making it an important aspect of the world's crude oil supply.
If these reserves or supplies were to be stopped or banned by the OPEC nations, or any of these majority supplying nations were to stop their export, then there will be a vast 'disaster' or rather 'crisis' in the nations that depend on these supplies. So, events such as <u>the 1956 closing of the Suez Canal by Egypt or the OPEC oil embargo of 1973 are proof that the Middle East nations could threaten the world's oil supply.
</u>
Thus, the correct answers are options 1 and 2.
Well you have to read it carefully and see if the passage says something about that?
