Explain the reasons for U.S. neutrality during the 1920s and 1930s. How did ideas about neutrality change during the period from
the end of World War I to the passage of the Lend-Lease Act? Be sure to include any events, terms, or people that may support your response. In your opinion, what was the point at which U.S. actions were no longer neutral? Explain your reasoning with supporting details from the lesson.
Criticize or defend each of the U.S. actions surrounding World War II that are listed below. Justify your opinion with supporting details from the lesson. pls type two paragraphs
The main reason was because the United States didn't wish to be involved in foreign wars. The ideas about neutrality changed during the period from the end of World War 1 to the passage of the Lend-Lease Act because the democratic governed countries we helped were non threatening and more likely to receive our help with gratitude than countries with dictators. We helped Britain and our other allies because they had governments that we viewed as more accepting of our help.
In my opinion, the turning point at which the U.S. was no longer neutral was when we started helping our allies.
Explanation:
I haven't read this part of history yet. Do you have any examples that you can send me? If you do, I can fit them in.
It can be implied in the passage from Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass that the cruel reality of slavery is described as "<span>Slaves were treated like property and separated from loved ones." The author, Douglass is a known advocate of anti-slavery movements and women suffrage.</span>
Those governments resist change, demonstrating that substantial challenges remain before us. Democratization in Eurasia faces many challenges. Progress continues to be measured largely in terms of civil society development; political reform remains stalled – and some states are in fact backsliding.
