the answer is that it would be true
I believe the answer is: <span>claims about human behavior need to be supported with evidence
In scientific field, an evidence is important so other experts in similar field could review them and bring us closer to the truth.
But compared to other science fileds, Data from psychological research is much more likely to be in qualitative form rather than quantitative.</span>
Its ability to report information to the public easily and can be seen by many almost immedialtly
I just know of the highest paid actress
Scarlett Johansson tops Forbes' list of the highest-paid actresses, earning $56 million.
<span>the word "science" defines everything around us and
beyond our human imagination. understanding science is always a lot tougher
than other topics and it requires a mind and brain far more sophisticated than
the average level. if one reads a science article, he /she must always look for
author's biases. an author's bias is basically his/her opinions and theory. but
most of the time, science articles always has author's biases to be unbiased
cause it is a factual interpretation. if the author is biased, then the facts
or ideas could be misinterpreting and could lead to some false concepts and
news.</span>