1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
d1i1m1o1n [39]
2 years ago
15

What were three intended purposes of the Indian Relocation Act of 1956?

History
1 answer:
laila [671]2 years ago
8 0

The Indian Relocation Act of 1956 is also known as Public Law 959 or the Adult Vocational Training Program. The three intended purposes of the Indian Relocation Act of 1956 are;

  • To provide job training for  Native Americans, primarily  in industry.
  • To help Native Americans  settle in urban areas
  • To provide new reservations for  Native Americans in better  locations.

<h2>Relocation Act of 1956 </h2>

This was known to be a paid moving expenses and provided vocational training to Native Americans. This are set up for the people who were willing to move off the reservation into urban areas.

The United States law aim to encourage Native Americans in the United State to leave Indian reservations and adopt into the population in urban areas.

Learn more about the Act from

brainly.com/question/714974

You might be interested in
The supreme court ruled in baker v. carr (1962) that legislative districts with unequal populations were unfair. in its decision
Citrus2011 [14]
The case of Baker v. Carr from 1962 is an important case that majorly influenced redistricting. Redistricting means changing the way the voting districts are delineated and after this case the court could decide about redistricting cases. This allowed for voting districts to be redrawn under the guidance of the federal courts.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the name of the series of laws put in place to encourage the 13 English colonies to trade with England?
lions [1.4K]
<span>The correct answer is the Navigation Acts. Basically, the Englishmen and the King wanted to create a monopoly over the colonies' trading because they wanted to become more rich. They made the acts to prevent the colonies from trading with France and Spain and others who they didn't think of as enemies.</span>
6 0
4 years ago
1. The dual court system in the United States is composed of what two systems?
aev [14]

Answer:

The U.S. judiciary features a dual court system comprising a federal court system and the courts in each of the fifty states. On both the federal and state sides, the U.S. Supreme Court is at the top and is the final court of appeal.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was NOT a long-term effect of the creation of the Mongol states shown in the map?
Marta_Voda [28]

Answer:

. The widespread adoption of firearms by states in the Middle East and Western Europ

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Are there any complanies like.the East India Companies in existance today? how are they different?
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer

British East India Company. It turns out, that India was never originally colonized by the British crown, but by a multinational company (MNC). Robert Clive, who won the Battle Of Palashi (‘Plassey’ for ‘Hey bear, ek gin and tonic idaar!’ folks), was an employee (‘Team Leader’ in 21st-century terms) of the world’s first public limited company. (Britons had equity stakes and to make favorable trading deals, the company ended up having an army.)That hired army ended up ousting the weak-by-then Mughals and accidentally ended up with a nation. Ours. Yes, a large company, so influential and powerful, that it made laws of another nation. The modern equivalent would be if, say, Coca-Cola removed the Chinese premier and started running it. It’s unheard of, mad. But that’s what happened, and that is how I am writing this column in English and you’re reading it in English, both parties pretending as we folks have always been English speakers and writers. All because a bunch of company middle management wanted to protect their investments and threaten some nabobs for their tea and silk and spice and opium trade. And the company’s armies also meted out their version of justice. This begs the question: can a company do that? Today, if you visit the dockland area of London from where the East India Company ships once sailed, hundreds a day to rule Calcutta, Bombay, and Madras, there’s a wildlife reserve, a jogging track, an indoor concert hall called the O2 Arena, a bunch of suburban high-rises that look a bit like Whitefield in Bengaluru, and an HSBC call center. Zero signs that it was once the epicenter of the imperial world, ruling 3/4th of the planet with trade.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • B02070-M/J Comprehensive Science 2 [Q4
    9·1 answer
  • How have Texans profited through the use of maquiladoras?
    12·1 answer
  • In hunter-gatherer societies, people lived a
    5·1 answer
  • Which economic reform occurred during the Progressive era?
    10·2 answers
  • How did white cultural values influence new policies?
    7·1 answer
  • What was a major cause of the migration to the coties at the turn of the century? A. Plentiful housing B. Western expansion C. I
    12·1 answer
  • Where was the Seneca Falls Convention of 1848
    15·2 answers
  • What are some inventions or ideas that help to adVance trade
    8·1 answer
  • Analyzing Political Cartoons Consider the papers lying next to the woman
    8·1 answer
  • What does Douglass want his speech to focus on?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!