Answer:
And, after boasting this way of my tolerance, I come to the admission that it has a limit. Conduct may be founded on the hard rock or the wet marshes but after a certain point I don't care what it's founded on. When I came back from the East last autumn I felt that I wanted the world to be in uniform and at a sort of moral attention forever; I wanted no more riotous excursions with privileged glimpses into the human heart. Only Gatsby, the man who gives his name to this book, was exempt from my reaction—Gatsby who represented everything for which I have an unaffected scorn. If personality is an unbroken series of successful gestures, then there was something gorgeous about him, some heightened sensitivity to the promises of life, as if he were related to one of those intricate machines that register earthquakes ten thousand miles away. This responsiveness had nothing to do with that flabby impressionability which is dignified under the name of the "creative temperament"—it was an extraordinary gift for hope, a romantic readiness such as I have never found in any other person and which it is not likely I shall ever find again. No—Gatsby turned out all right at the end; it is what preyed on Gatsby, what foul dust floated in the wake of his dreams that temporarily closed out my interest in the abortive sorrows and short-winded elations of men.
Answer:
the answer is weak animals on apex
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Ambiguity in literature refers to all those events, circumstances, story-lines or symbols in a context that carry multiple meanings.
A single element can have several interpretations and this allows the reader to engage in an active manner in the story by wondering about the meanings implied by the author according to personal experiences or reactions.
Ambiguity in literature means that the author is deliberately leaving certain meanings within the text unclear, and so when a reader is analyzing a part of the text, they can come up with multiple meanings, thus A is the correct answer.
