The standard for evaluating sources has been matched with their descriptions as follows:
- Trustworthiness: The issue is addressed from a balanced and fair viewpoint.
- Relevance: The text gives information related to your topic.
- Authority: The writer of the text has experience or expertise on the topic.
- Currency: The information is up-to-date.
<h3>What are the standards for evaluating sources?</h3>
The standards for evaluating sources are the benchmarks that are used to proof articles for accuracy.
Before the information contained in a material can be accepted, the content should be free from bias. It should also be relevant and come from a credible and reliable source.
Learn more about the evaluation of sources here:
brainly.com/question/11916196
#SPJ1
I believe this is an 'internal' conflict, because she has to decide on whether to confront her two opposing thoughts of whether to defend the people who hate her or to use violence to gain human rights
Answer:
Your answer is Option A
Explanation:
Based on the given poem, the narrator says that he hears the flute of the narrator from his room and it is very beautiful, when it is dark.
He further narrates that in the daytime when the neighbor plays the flute, he does not want to hear it because it is daylight and the neighbor is far and has a bald head so he runs away and looks for something else to occupy his time.
When night time approaches, when he bears the flute, he tries to remove the image of the fat, bald man and think of him as a young man and the music is sweet to his ears once again.
The contrast the narrator creates develops the theme of the poem by portraying the narrator's vanity by wanting the beauty of the music to match the image of the man (option A)
There are multiple ways of comparing and contrasting structures that each have different implications and dangers.
1. The back-and-forth method, in which every other sentence compares and contrasts. ie:
P1- theme
-p1 Book A is blah, whereas Book B is blah.
P2- theme
-p2 Book A is blah.... you get the point,
The danger of this method is sounding too redundant, although it does a good job of focusing on the themes.
2. The separate, mixed theme method, in which an entire paragraph is dedicated to each subject, but the themes are thus mixed up within those paragraphs. This method is less redundant but runs the risk of losing clarity of theme.
3. The compare vs. contrast method. This one is fairly straightforward: A paragraph comparing, a paragraph contrasting, and one of synthesis at the end. The pros: It's playing it safe, and it'll work. The cons: It's boring.
Combinations of these 3 methods work as well, it all depends on your personal writing style and the subjects you're comparing.
Good luck
