A good meeting must always be agenda-oriented, systematic, necessary people should only be the invitees and many more.
<h3>What is a good meeting?</h3>
A good meeting must be systematic, agenda-oriented, positive, and energetic. although it's very difficult to achieve a good meeting. The participants should be well prepared for the meeting. It should lead to decisions.
The criteria are necessary for every good meeting are:
- should have a detailed agenda
- necessary people should only be the invitees
- the members of the meeting should respect each other.
Therefore, option b aptly describes the criteria for every good meeting.
Learn more about the good meeting here:
brainly.com/question/13897604
Answer:
Explanation:
Margaret Gonzalez-Perez found that the role of women in terrorist groups is more closely determined by the political orientation of an organization than its tactics. Margaret Gonzalez has worked and examined twenty six terrorist organizations which were emerged after world war 2 and then separated it into two groups one which are domestic focus and the other with international focus. Her research found out that women role in terrorist organizations or groups is interlinked with political orientation.
<span> The roman republic</span>
<span>The Romans established a form of government — a republic — that was copied by countries for centuries In fact, the government of the United States is based partly on Rome's model.</span>It all began when the Romans overthrew their Etruscan conquerors in 509 B.C.E. Centered north of Rome, the Etruscans had ruled over the Romans for hundreds of years.
Once free, the Romans established a republic, a government in which citizens elected representatives to rule on their behalf. A republic is quite different from a democracy, in which every citizen is expected to play an active role in governing the state.
No, Krakuer does not cite any evidence regarding his analysis about alex relationship with his father.He believe that alex just got stuck in the middle of conflict between McCandless and the father. But, he is just basing the assumption on the relationship between McCandless and the father without knowing for sure how alex behave to the conflict.
