Answer:
celebrity auctions can be very weird. However, occasionally, there is some semblance of sanity to the whole process.
One thing that stands out clearly from the passage is that hunting for this celebrity paraphernalia is just human nature. In paragraph three, there is evidence from archeological records to demonstrate this.
Perhaps another contributory factor, besides the fact that there are people who use these things for a good cause, is that money follows sentiments.
For a family who is in the tennis business one way or another, getting hold of one of Senera Williams' tennis rackets would provide an immense source of emotional or sentimental satisfaction. People in the same industry would feel that way too.
If one person places value on a thing, it may hold no value at all. But if there is a whole industry of professionals, who make a living off celebrity auctions, the chances are that everyone will start to see opportunities even with the most bizarre celebrity artifacts.
In the end, whether this habit is for opportunistic reasons, emotional reasons, or philanthropic reasons, it's all about human nature.
Explanation:
hope this helps! happy holidays.
It is true that an interview can be considered a source.
You may get some useful information and data from an interview.
Hi there, the answer is The fact that the entire town has paid to see the “show” again, but this time they’re bringing things to throw at the duke and the king.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Because it's the people's choice if they want to eat the junk food that's being advertised some people can disagree because advertising junk food may cause that craving and they are either trying to stop eating that or they don't like junk food but I still say it should be advertised because there are people that may want to try new things
Answer:
They are surprised to see her defend their father
Explanation:
They're surprised because she has been hostile to their father. At the end it says that "the boys looked at each other in astonishment and felt that they had lost a powerful ally." They lost her as an ally because she made a point that their father worked hard for the money and that they should not waste it. Therefore the answer is the second option.