Answer:
The speaker is concerned that the subject of the poem will become lost during her life is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Jimmy Santiago Baca was born in 1952 in Santa Fe. According to <em>Poetry Foundation</em>, "of Chicano and Apache descent". In the mentioned poem, I am offering this poem, the speaker creates a world around the poem, the only possession he has to offer the subject. In the second stanza, he does talk about warmth provided to the object, but it is not the stanza mentioned in the question. In general, the idea of the <em>whole</em> poem could be resumed in letter D statement. Even though it looks like that at the very beginning of the third stanza, the speaker doesn't provide directions to travel through the wilderness. In this stanza, the speaker is concerned that the subject will become lost during her life, and also mentions he would always be with the object.
I don’t understand what you’re trying to ask?
I think it's D the poem convey it's theme
If Khalil scored low on the intuitive function, that means he must score high on the opposite trait, which would be the <u>sensing function.</u>
<u />
<u />
<h3>Intuition vs Sensing</h3>
Both intuition and sensing are functions based on Jungian theories concerning our personalities. Intuition and sensing refer to the way we learn, that is, to how we take in information from the world.
A person who scores high in intuition is someone who learns based on his own perceptions and impressions of the information obtained. A person who scores high in sensing learns from his five senses.
One way that such a difference often shows itself is on people's abilities with their hands. Normally, sensory people are better painters or sculptors, for example. However, we must keep in mind there are exceptions to all cases.
With the information above in mind, we can say Khalil scored high on sensing since he scored low on intuition.
Learn more about intuition here:
brainly.com/question/887641
Answer:For close to 50 years, educators and politicians from classrooms to the Oval Office have stressed the importance of graduating students who are skilled critical thinkers.
Content that once had to be drilled into students’ heads is now just a phone swipe away, but the ability to make sense of that information requires thinking critically about it. Similarly, our democracy is today imperiled not by lack of access to data and opinions about the most important issues of the day, but rather by our inability to sort the true from the fake (or hopelessly biased).
We have certainly made progress in critical-thinking education over the last five decades. Courses dedicated to the subject can be found in the catalogs of many colleges and universities, while the latest generation of K-12 academic standards emphasize not just content but also the skills necessary to think critically about content taught in English, math, science and social studies classes.
Explanation:
