I believe that it is A , i remember hearing it i. history class
France and Spain, for instance, were governed by autocratic sovereigns whose rule was absolute; their colonists went to America as servants of the Crown. The English colonists, on the other hand, enjoyed far more freedom.
Spanish and French colonist were only going to the Americas for for trade ,gold and silver. England went there to get religious freedom and land.
The Spanish and English colonies were slightly alike in the poor and unfair treatment of indigenous people and substantially different in religion and economic base. The Spanish and English were slightly comparable in terms of treatment of indigenous people. It was different .
To know more about Spanish and English colonies here
brainly.com/question/8695886
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is option B. "Citizens have a right to revolt and replace an existing government that becomes oppressive".
Explanation:
John Locke was a 17th century Englishman who serves as an inspiration for the founding of the United States. The idea of John Locke that most influenced the development of self-government in the American colonies was that citizens have a right to revolt and replace an existing government that becomes oppressive. John Locke believed that all governments must provide the natural rights of the citizens, which are: life, liberty, and property. Since American colonies not had liberty or property, they had the right to revolt and replace their existing government.
Answer: According to the Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, the number of electors of any state equals the size of its total congressional delegation.
It is determined by the number of population made by the census.
Answer: yes and no. For the most part yes as it allows the government to pick and choose what is and isn't recognized as a local currency. A good example of fiat money is gold.
