There can only be two definite x-intercepts, so your goal it to find 2 numbers of x that, when plugged into the equation, give you the answer of 0. 1 is the first x-intercept(4-24+20 equals 0). The second one is 5 (100-120+20 equals 0). So the average is 3, so the axis of symmetry is 3 since 5+1=6, and 6/2=3
Honestly, there is an easier way to find the axis of symmetry. the equation would be -b/2a, where as b is the coefficient in the second part of the equation, while a is the first coefficient in the equation. -(-24) is 24, and 4*2=8, so 24/8=3
I hope I actually answered this the way you wanted. You asked for an equation, but I just answered the axis of symmetry with very simple equation initially and another equation
The first false statement in the proof as it stands is in Line 5, where it is claimed that a line of length 2.83 is congruent to a line of length 4.47. This mistake cannot be corrected by adding lines to the proof.
_____
The first erroneous tactical move is in Line 4, where the length of DE is computed, rather than the length of FD. This mistake can be corrected by adding lines to the proof.
A correct SAS proof would use segment FD in Line 4, so it could be argued that the first mistake is there.
Answer: Melinda’s loan will be equal to the value of the car after 10 months.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hi, to answer this question we have to equal both equations:
Melinda’s loan will be equal to the value of the car
y = y
10,000 – 250x = 8,000 – 50x
Solving for x:
10,000-8,000 = -50x+250x
2,000 = 200x
2,000/200 =x
10 = x
Melinda’s loan will be equal to the value of the car after 10 months.
Feel free to ask for more if needed or if you did not understand something.
Answer:
If you're being charged annually, you would end up paying $918.
Step-by-step explanation:
850 * 0.04 (or 4%) = 34
34 * 2(years) = 68
850 + 68 = 918
You would end up paying $68 in interest.
Answer:
cars weighed the most per item and desks the least