C. Is a Factual Statement
This one is tricky, because scientific law can explain an observation, or be used to make a prediction, but I believe that C. is the most correct of the 4 answers.
Yup this is true because if the supreme court agrees on it they can veto.
Catherine de Medici is the person.
<span>The correct answer is A. The US Annexed the Phillippines. They didn't annex it but they did get their support and the Phillippines started working with the United States but there were quarrels and they even had a war at one point. Also, at one point in time, the US did have control over the Phillippines, but it wasn't after the War.</span>
Answer: 1. It is an official change made to a law, or a legal document.
2. The first ten amendments to our Constitution, called the Bill of Rights, guarantee basic freedoms of the American people. For example, freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, and freedom of religion are guaranteed rights. So if the government is denying someone's right to do something the person can use the constitution to back them up and prove they have the right to do something.
3. I think they should protest
4. I don’t known about this one
5. The main reason would be conflict of interest.
Conflicts of interest can be actual or perceived, but can have serious implications in either form. Attorneys can find themselves in hot water and even put their clients at risk if they aren’t thorough in their investigation of potential conflicts.
6. Amendments are the only way to change the constitution. The purpose of amendments is to provide a law with the protection of the federal government. States are unable to pass any law that violates with an amendment.
7. I don’t about this either
8. Without the Bill of Rights, this right could be taken and if the government becomes entirely corrupted, people could be put in jail for false accusation, their race, religion or sexuality, and many other unfair situations.
9. How should I do this one?
Explanation:
