1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ikadub [295]
3 years ago
12

How did the underground railroad lead to the civil war?

History
1 answer:
Delvig [45]3 years ago
5 0
The underground railroad physically resisted the repressive laws that held slaves in bondage, by provoking fear and in anger in the south, and prompting the enactment of harsh legislation that eroded the rights of white Americans, the Underground Railroad was a direct contributing cause of the Civil War.
You might be interested in
The first great awakening in american colonies...
Vikentia [17]
It had to do with religious freedom
4 0
3 years ago
Why did the South's dependence on a single cash crop after the Civil War hurt the region's economy?
tankabanditka [31]
Because there was a investment in industries other than agriculture
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
At its peak the Inca city of Cuzco had between 100,000 and _______ people?
vladimir2022 [97]
At its peak the Inca city of Cuzco had between 100,000 and 300,000 people.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What happens if the police illegally seize evidence in violation of the fourth amendment?
Tom [10]

In case that the police or any other authority proceeds against the right granted in the Fourth Ammendment, their findings, having been illegally obtained, can not be presented before any court as evidence against any individual, nor a judge could allow to have them as evidence in a trial, because this would ignore the Sixth Ammendment by violating the right to an impartial trial.

6 0
3 years ago
What are consequences of globalization?
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Globalization must be expected to influence the distribution of income as well as its level. So far as the distribution of income between countries is concerned, standard theory would lead one to expect that all countries will benefit. Economists have long preached that trade is mutually beneficial, and most of us believe that the experience of widespread growth alongside rapidly growing trade in the postwar period serves to substantiate that. Similarly most FDI goes where a multinational has intellectual capital that can contribute something to the local economy, and is therefore likely to be mutually beneficial to investor and recipient. And a flow of capital that finances a real investment is again likely to benefit both parties, since the yield on the investment is expected to be higher than the rate of interest the borrower has to pay, while that rate of interest is also likely to be higher than the lender could expect at home since otherwise there would have been no incentive to send it abroad. Loose talk about free trade making the rich countries richer and poor countries poorer finds no support in economic analysis.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was a result of the treaty of verdun in843
    10·1 answer
  • What are the basins and rivers of Africa
    11·1 answer
  • The Treaty of Tordesillas established which of the following?
    14·2 answers
  • History, women of
    14·1 answer
  • Yoour writing a short fion story for publication who is most likely your audience and purpose
    9·1 answer
  • In which region did the Mogollon, Hohokam, and ancestral Puebloans live?
    9·1 answer
  • Followers of muhammads____ faith condemned idol worship and were called____.
    8·2 answers
  • The struggle for women’s suffrage was not won until _________ with the passage of the _________ Amendment.
    6·2 answers
  • What are the three features in the U.S constitution?​
    14·1 answer
  • The interstate commence act of 1887 required
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!