1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gladu [14]
2 years ago
13

*30 POINTS* PLZZ EXPLAIN YOUR ANSWER

History
1 answer:
sergeinik [125]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The colonial responses to British policies after the French and Indian War can be classified as violent or nonviolent. Hence, we have

Non Violent responses to be the following

Committees of Correspondence: this was formed in 1764, and it was a means of a series of dialogue among patriot leaders throughout the American colonies. The purpose is to unite the colonies in opposition to the British Parliament. It is nonviolent in nature.

Non-Importation Movement: this was formed after the Sugar Act of 1764 and the Stamp Act of 1765. And it is a form of protest by the American colonists for the purpose of boycotting the British goods in an effort to change imperial policy. It involves the abstinence of the American colonists from purchasing or consuming imported tea and other goods. It is nonviolent in nature

Stamp Act Congress: which was conducted in 1765, was the first meeting of the representatives from various American colonies to conduct a unified protest against British taxation, including the petition of the king and Parliament for change the objectionable measures. It is nonviolent in nature

While the violent response is the

Boston Massacre: this occurred in the year 1770. And it was a street fight or open and physical confrontation involving the British soldiers shooting killing several people while being harassed by the American colonists' mob who chose to throw harmful objects like snowballs, stones, and sticks, towards the British soldiers in Boston.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why do you think the
IgorC [24]

Answer:

Federalism is a compromise meant to eliminate the disadvantages of both systems. In a federal system, power is shared by the national and state governments. The Constitution designates certain powers to be the domain of a central government, and others are specifically reserved to the state governments.

Explanation:

The have power to rule over what goes on so they reduce energy to the Federal System

3 0
3 years ago
1. Because he had supported Texas independence, Santa Anna branded __________ a traitor to Mexico. Yet some Texas leaders were a
Anni [7]

1. A. Lorenzo de Zavala

2. B. Texians believed they did not need to pay taxes to Mexico

3. A. Spain would not recognize colonials as equal citizens: The Spanish also made the Mexicans have lots of tax and almost all of it went to Spain.

4. D. They knew that the Alamo would protect them from the Mexican Army: Because they believed in this cause and fought bravely.

5. D.The memory of those lost at the Alamo and Goliad: They rallied behind Remember the Alamo and Remember the Goliad which were both very significant events for Texan rebels.

6. B. Became the first senator to be elected to the state of Tennessee: Sam Houston born in Virginia; he became a lawyer congressman and senator in Tennessee.

6 0
3 years ago
Hey! I just wanted to say something to those who feel like they’re not worth it. Just wanna tell you that you’re worth more than
Ilya [14]

Answer:

Thank you bro !

I'm from Egypt I've been living at UK FOR over than 9 years

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2.
enyata [817]

The main source of conflict at the Constitutional Convention was in regards to federal v. state power.

Federalists v. Anti-Federalists fought for weeks through published essays to push forward their view on whether their should be a strong Federal government or whether there should be a weak federal government to allow for strong and sovereign states.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ways that Andrew Jackson wasn’t democratic
Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

Eager to build up the country as it already existed, they were cool to territorial expansion. Angered by Jackson's large claims for presidential power and rotation in office, they charged that the Jacksonians had brought corruption and executive tyranny, not democracy

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Summarize the significance of James Meredith actions in 1962
    14·1 answer
  • What is the answer ? Help me!!!
    5·1 answer
  • Which term best describes the cultural, economic, and social communication and connection between various groups throughout the
    12·1 answer
  • Please help ! Everything is above
    14·1 answer
  • Which amendment in the Bill of Rights does this represent
    12·1 answer
  • After the War of 1812, disputes with Great Britain over land ownership and use in North America were settled primarily by
    10·2 answers
  • What happened in 1814 that allowed the British government to send more troops to America?
    9·1 answer
  • Select the country that controlled each of the following ports in the Indian and Pacific Oceans during the 16th and 17th centuri
    15·2 answers
  • The town meeting is practiced by several small towns in the United States. In a town meeting, any voting citizen may vote on new
    6·2 answers
  • Why does Douglass call this celebration a “hypocrisy” in 1852?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!